- #1
Lynch101
Gold Member
- 761
- 83
- TL;DR Summary
- Interested in learning more about anti-realist interpretations of quantum mechanics and the consequences of such a position.
Having discussed interpretations of QM here and elsewhere, to only a basic level, I have encountered proponents of what is described as "anti-realism". This is not to be confused with "non-realism", which might be equated with simple instrumentalism or "shut up and calculate".
To try and clarify, from what I've read, anti-realism appears to go a step further than simple instrumentalism. Where instrumentalism says that the mathematics of QM are nothing more than a tool for calculating the probability of macro-level measurements, the anti-realist interpretation adds to this by saying that it doesn't make sense to talk about the system prior to measurement.
That statement - it doesn't make sense to talk about the system prior to measurement - in itself isn't anti-realist, but often when probed, some proponents seem to take an anti-realist position because the alternative i.e. talking about the system prior to measurement, would seem to necessitate the presence of hidden variables.
It is often argued that Neil's Bohr's position was anti-realist. I can't quite remember the quote closely enough to search for it, but there is a quote attributed to him which seems to suggest that reality doesn't exist until we measure it. Indeed, the views of Bohr prompted Einstein to say "I like to think that the moon is there, even when I'm not looking at it".
1) What are some examples of anti-realist interpretations? I've heard that QFT can be interpreted as such. Are there others?
2) Do all the alternatives to anti-realist interpretations involve hidden variables?
To try and clarify, from what I've read, anti-realism appears to go a step further than simple instrumentalism. Where instrumentalism says that the mathematics of QM are nothing more than a tool for calculating the probability of macro-level measurements, the anti-realist interpretation adds to this by saying that it doesn't make sense to talk about the system prior to measurement.
That statement - it doesn't make sense to talk about the system prior to measurement - in itself isn't anti-realist, but often when probed, some proponents seem to take an anti-realist position because the alternative i.e. talking about the system prior to measurement, would seem to necessitate the presence of hidden variables.
It is often argued that Neil's Bohr's position was anti-realist. I can't quite remember the quote closely enough to search for it, but there is a quote attributed to him which seems to suggest that reality doesn't exist until we measure it. Indeed, the views of Bohr prompted Einstein to say "I like to think that the moon is there, even when I'm not looking at it".
I have quite a few questions about the anti-realist interpretations of QM but to start:Adam Becker - What is real? said:As Heisenberg put it, "the idea of an objective real world, whose smallest parts exist independently of whether or not we observe them, is impossible.
Bohr dismissed the idea of a quantum world altogether. "There is no quantum world", he said. "Isolated material particles are abstractions, their properties on the quantum theory being definable and observable only through their interaction with other syststems."
1) What are some examples of anti-realist interpretations? I've heard that QFT can be interpreted as such. Are there others?
2) Do all the alternatives to anti-realist interpretations involve hidden variables?