Applying Pascal's Law to a Hydraulic Lift Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter djc88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydraulic Lift
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a hydraulic lift problem involving two pistons with different cross-sectional areas. The user is struggling with part C, specifically how to determine the height drop of the car when an additional mass enters. Key points include the conservation of volume principle, which states that the volume of oil displaced by one piston must equal the volume displaced by the other. The relationship between the forces and areas of the pistons is crucial, as is the understanding that the density of the oil remains constant. Ultimately, applying Pascal's law and correctly calculating the forces and volumes will lead to the solution for the height drop.
djc88
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i'm having difficulty with part C of this problem.

A hydraulic lift has two connected pistons with cross-sectional
areas 25 cm2 and 430 cm2. It is filled with oil of density 500 kg/m3.

a) What mass must be placed on the small piston to support a car of mass 1300 kg at equal fluid levels? (answer: 75.58kg)

b) With the lift in balance with equal fluid levels, a person of mass 60 kg gets into the car. What is the equilibrium height difference in the fluid levels in the pistons? (Answer= 2.8m)

c) How much did the height of the car drop when the person got in the car? ?

please help. my rationale thus far is that volume is conserved. could anyone direct me in applying the right concept? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please help. my rationale thus far is that volume is conserved. could anyone direct me in applying the right concept? thanks.

If your rationale is correct how was the mass accommodated? What changes are there to the density of the oil or the amount of force at the opposite piston?
 
Tzemach said:
If your rationale is correct how was the mass accommodated? What changes are there to the density of the oil or the amount of force at the opposite piston?

there are no changes to the density of the oil. the force is what I'm confused about. since on the opposite end, no additional mass is added, is the force acting upon that piston equivalent to part a? or do i have to find the new force, F2=F(A1/A2); where F=1360kg (mass of the car +person). I've tried this problem a million different ways (feels like), perhaps I'm rounding incorrectly.

i know that if piston 1 drops by a certain amount, piston 2 will rise proportionally in volume... the answer i keep getting is ~0.17 meters. which isn't correct...
 
Let's call the mass acting on the smaller piston M1. (M1=75.58 kg, if it's correct)
Let's call the mass of the person M2.

You have to consider that the total volume of oil remains constant.
So, if a volume of oil in the big cylinder (car side) goes down because of the added mass of the person, the same volume of oil will go up in the other cylinder. You can calculate the relation between the two volumes because you know the areas of the two pistons.
The new equlibrium requires that (eliminating "g" constant on both sides):

M2 + mass of the volume of oil in the big cylinder =
= M1 + mass of the volume of oil in the small cylinder.

Take care of the signs (one of the oil levels goes down, the other up).
 
djc88 said:
please help. my rationale thus far is that volume is conserved. could anyone direct me in applying the right concept? thanks.

(The density of oil does not change.)

Do you remember on what principle the barometer works? Remember Pascal's law?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top