How Is Buoyancy Calculated for a Cube Suspended in Mercury and Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter patricks
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the buoyancy of a cube suspended between layers of mercury and water, specifically focusing on the heights of the cube submerged in each liquid. The user initially calculated the heights as h1=0.49m in mercury and h2=0.11m in water, but noted a discrepancy with their teacher's solution of h1=0.506m and h2=0.094m. The teacher's approach considers the weight of the displaced water acting in the same direction as gravity, which the user finds confusing. A simpler method suggested involves applying Archimedes' principle, equating the weight of the block to the combined weight of the displaced liquids. The user also faced issues with LaTeX formatting in their post.
patricks
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cube of iron 60 cm on each side is suspended between layers of mercury and water. The density of mercury is 13.6 g/cm^3. What height of the cube is in each liquid? What if the cube is made of lead?

Homework Equations


h=h_1 + h_2=0.6 m
\rho_{Fe}=7880 kg/m^3
\rho_{Pb}=11300 kg/m^3
\rho_{Hg}=13600 kg/m^3
\rho_{H2O}=1000 kg/m^3

Where h_1 = height of the block in the Mercury, and h_2 = height of the block in the Water.

The Attempt at a Solution


F=0N=F_b - F_g
F_g=\rho_{Pb}*A*h*g
F_b=\Delta P * A=(P_f - P_i)*A
P_f = P_i + \rho_{H2O}*h_2*g + \rho_{Hg}*h_1*g
F_b=A*g*(\rho_{H2O}*h_2 + \rho_{Hg}*h_1)
0N=A*g*(\rho_{H2O}*h_2 + \rho_{Hg}*h_1) - \rho_{Pb}*A*h*g
\rho_{H2O}*h_2 + \rho_{Hg}*h_1 = \rho_{Pb}*h
h_2+h_1=0.6m
h_1=0.49m
h_2=0.11m

The way I thought through the problem is any pressure at the top of the block would be canceled by that same amount of pressure at the bottom of the block, so all I needed to calculate was the addition pressure at the bottom of the block (gauge pressure, I believe it is called), which I took to be the weight of the water displaced plus the weight of the mercury displaced.

This is NOT the solution my teacher came up with. My teachers solution requires the weight of water displaced to act in the same direction as the gravitational force on the block itself which results in a solution of h_1=0.506m, h_2=0.094m, which does not seem to make any sense to me. If this is indeed true, why is it true?

Also, how exactly do I do a new line in the Latex? Google suggests \\ or \newline, but neither of those seem to work in the "Preview Post" thing. Maybe if I submit it will fix itself, if not, I apologize for the broken Latex.

Okay submitting didn't work. Not sure what to try. Edit: deleted most of the tex stuff.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
patricks said:
This is NOT the solution my teacher came up with. My teachers solution requires the weight of water displaced to act in the same direction as the gravitational force on the block itself which results in a solution of h_1=0.506m, h_2=0.094m, which does not seem to make any sense to me. If this is indeed true, why is it true?

Your teacher was probably led astray by the fact that the water does press down on the block. We are only interested in the difference in pressure between the top and the bottom, and that difference is equal to a column of height h_2 of water on top of a column of height h_1 of mercury.

I think it's somewhat simpler to keep pressure out of it and use Archimedes law.

weight of the block = weight of displaced mercury + weight of displaced water

h \rho_{Pb} A g = h_1 \rho_{Hg} A g + h_2 \rho_{H20} A g which is the same as you have.

Your Latex looked fine. There seems to be a problem with updating of the preview. I get to see a preview of a reply of mine in another thread. I hope it comes out right if I press "Submit Reply"
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top