I Archimedes' principle and the column of water

  • Thread starter Thread starter abrek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phisics
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the volume of displaced water will equal the volume of the smaller container when it is lowered into a larger container of water. Key points include the impact of the height of the water column on resistance and the incompressibility of water, which may affect the volume released. The mechanics of the movable platform and the pressure exerted by the 2-meter water column are critical to understanding the system's behavior. Clarification is needed regarding the mass of the piston and its ability to maintain the column height. Overall, the outcome hinges on the interplay of pressure and displacement in the described setup.
abrek
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
If go
If you assemble the structure shown in the picture into a large container of water, lower the smaller container onto a special movable platform (red). Will the volume of displaced water be equal to the volume of the smaller container (M) according to Archimedes’ principle, or will the fact that the release of liquid occurs at a height, the water column will create resistance and less water will come out in volume?
 

Attachments

  • Без названия1_20240505173630.png
    Без названия1_20240505173630.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 59
  • Без названия1_20240505174108.png
    Без названия1_20240505174108.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 64
  • Без названия1_20240505173630.png
    Без названия1_20240505173630.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 72
  • Без названия1_20240505174108.png
    Без названия1_20240505174108.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 54
Physics news on Phys.org
The question has nothing to do with the Archimedes principle. It has to do with the incompressibility of water.
 
abrek said:
.. will the fact that the release of liquid occurs at a height, the water column will create resistance and less water will come out in volume?
What do you think, and why?

Note that the "special movable platform (red)" shown in the initial condition must be physically restricted by its cylinder from moving up due to the static pressure created by the 2-meter column.
 
^^^^... as well as in the final condition.
 
I think the far left hand diagram needs some explanation. Does the red (lets call it a) piston have precisely the correct mass to keep the vertical column at 2m or is it restrained from rising?; this must be specified before going any further.

When M is lowered onto the piston, it will add a force downwards on the piston and water will be pushed out of the tube. The pressure at the bottom of the tube will always be 2m's worth whilst the tube is full.

I really don't know where this is going without more information.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
994
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K