Are double bonds/resonance structures more nucleophilic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structures
AI Thread Summary
Carbon-carbon double bonds are generally considered less nucleophilic due to the reduced formal charge on the carbon atoms, leading to fewer available electrons. However, they can still act as nucleophiles in reactions, particularly with strong acids like HX. The discussion also touches on the dual nature of double bonds, which can be electrophilic when interacting with strong nucleophiles, depending on the specific context and substituents present. Triple bonds are mentioned as a unique case, raising questions about their nucleophilicity compared to single bonds. Overall, the nucleophilic or electrophilic character of double bonds is influenced by their environment and substituents.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
I'm only talking about carbon-carbon double/triple bonds here.

A nucleophilic atom is one that would donate electrons to an electrophile (often a highly electronegative atom like oxygen or a halogen). Anyways, what about carbon-carbon double bonds? I'm inclined to think that they're less nucleophilic since their formal chage is reduced by the double bond (so there are fewer electrons to go around each carbon atom).

Does the same logic apply to resonance structures in benzene rings?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simfish said:
I'm only talking about carbon-carbon double/triple bonds here.

A nucleophilic atom is one that would donate electrons to an electrophile (often a highly electronegative atom like oxygen or a halogen). Anyways, what about carbon-carbon double bonds? I'm inclined to think that they're less nucleophilic since their formal chage is reduced by the double bond (so there are fewer electrons to go around each carbon atom).

Does the same logic apply to resonance structures in benzene rings?

More nucleophilic than what? Double bonds do donate their electrons in reactions so in that sense they are nucleophilic. They tend to do it to strong acids, specifically the proton. Usually the first step addition with HX. With benzene structures, strong acids like you would find in Friedel-Crafts conditions can be thought of in this way.

Triple bonds are a special case.
 
Are they more nucleophilic than carbon-carbon single bonds?

Oh okay I see. Could double bonds also be electrophilic? (with respect to strong nucleophiles?)
 
It's hard to give a definitive answer to this because it depends on a lot of things, e.g. what double bond/triple bond is reacting with and what its substituents are. With a strong enough electrophile, a double bond will be nucleophilic. Similarly, with a strong enough nucleophile, a double bond will be electrophilic.

In general though, double bonds that have an electrophilic substituent, e.g. something like C=C-NO2, will be electrophilic at the beta carbon, and something CH3S- can add to the double bond.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top