Are ordinary staples suitable for short wire links

  • Thread starter Thread starter hl_world
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Links Short Wire
AI Thread Summary
Ordinary staples can be used for short wire links in breadboards, but they may corrode over time, especially in moist or corrosive environments. While staples are conductive enough for dry conditions, they are not ideal due to potential rusting and electrochemical reactions with the breadboard's metal. Solid stranded copper hookup wire is recommended as a better alternative, as it avoids corrosion issues and is easier to work with. The suitability of staples ultimately depends on the materials involved. Overall, using proper wiring is advisable for long-term reliability in breadboard applications.
hl_world
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Are ordinary staples suitable for short wire links in breadboards without there being any corrosion?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Breadboards are meant more for prototyping purposes and aren't really meant to be used in wet / moist / corrosive environments. I'd bet the contacts would probably also corrode if used for any extended duration in such an environment. Well, these types are, at any rate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breadboard

Most staples will rust, but as long as it's dry, they should be conductive enough to make connections on a breadboard. Solid stranded copper hookup wire would probably be better, but then you'd need to cut and strip the ends.
 


Thanks for the response but the question was about the electro-chemistry between the staple and the metal in the breadboard. You know how computer peripheral cards have gold contacts to prevent this. I'm thinking the 2 metals might react and cause damage to the board.
 


The hookup wire is probably cheaper and easier to work with anyway, and afaik it has no corrosion issues :P

Depends what the staples and the breadboard is made from, I suppose.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top