Are planetary orbits elliptical because of a space–time conic section?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vectronix
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that planetary orbits are elliptical due to Newtonian gravity and not because of space-time conic sections. The elliptical nature of orbits was established by Kepler's first law in the early 1600s and later mathematically validated by Newton. In relativistic models, orbits do not conform to perfect conic sections, as evidenced by Mercury's orbit, which deviates from Newtonian predictions. The concept of lightcones is relevant to relativity but does not influence the shape of planetary orbits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian gravity and its implications on planetary motion.
  • Familiarity with Kepler's laws of planetary motion, particularly Kepler's first law.
  • Basic knowledge of general relativity and its impact on gravitational models.
  • Concept of lightcones in the context of spacetime diagrams.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Kepler's laws of planetary motion in detail.
  • Explore Newton's law of universal gravitation and its mathematical formulation.
  • Investigate the implications of general relativity on orbital mechanics.
  • Learn about the concept of lightcones and their significance in spacetime physics.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, physicists, and anyone interested in the mechanics of planetary motion and the distinctions between Newtonian and relativistic models of gravity.

Vectronix
Messages
65
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Planetary orbits look like they're part of a conic section where the cone is some kind of higher-dimensional part of space–time. I'm wondering about world lines and time lines, and if this is true or not.
Hi. I saw a 2D graph of two triangles, or maybe cones, one standing straight up, the other one "resting" on top of the other one but upside down with the two pointy ends touching others. The horizontal axis was labeled "space," the vertical axis was labeled "time." I'm sorry for my ignorance of this graph. So since the ellipse is a conic section, does that mean the world line that the planet traces out won't be centered on a vertical axis? Is this a timeline that isn't centered? To me, at least, it seems like the timeline of a planet orbiting a star is moving away from something. Perhaps away from another timeline? Can anyone explain this, especially about the timeline and about the helical world line not being centered vertically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are confusing several things. What I think you are describing with two cones is the past and future lightcone of an event. This is the surface that separates the parts of spacetime that can influence or be influenced by that event from the rest of spacetime that is too far away for causal influences to propagate in the time available.

This has nothing to do with the conic sections of orbits. In fact, orbits are only conic sections in Newtonian gravity. When you switch to a full relativistic model of gravity (and lightcones are only relevant in relativity), not even idealised orbits are perfect conic sections. In fact, the failure of Mercury to be exactly where Newtonian gravity said it would be was one of the earliest tests of relativity.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, FactChecker, PeterDonis and 1 other person
The elliptical shape of orbits was discovered from data by Kepler (Kepler's first law) in the early 1600's and was mathematically proven by Newton (and Liebnitz?) in the late 1600's. It is unrelated to relativity.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Okay, thanks for clearing that up.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Michelson & Morley in Space-Time Diagram: Can't Make it Work
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Undergrad Hypatia, Elliptic orbits, conic sections
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Undergrad Length contraction viewed with Heaviside equations
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Graduate What Are Conic Sections and How Are They Defined?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Undergrad "Unexpected" Symmetry in Elliptical Orbit
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Undergrad Request for Input: 2D Minkowski Spacetime Diagram Generator
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Solving Linear-Nonlinear Systems
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Graduate Elliptical Orbits (Using Newton's Model)
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
MHB Proof and tutorial on conic sections
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
Is my fictional Solar System stable and realistic?
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K