Are Synchronized Clocks in One Frame Desynchronized in Another?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demian^^
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Relativity
Demian^^
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit confused about a statement in my course on relativity. I have a system S' that is moving with a direction v (in the x'-direction) compared to the system S, so the following transformation formula holds:
t = gamma*(t'+vx'/c^2)
The textbook now goes on to say (translated from dutch.. possibly poorly):
"Clocks that are synchronized in S (t=constant) will be delayed more (t'=smaller) as their distance along the x' axis increases."
Indeed, I agree that t' will be smaller, as x' increases. However, I was wondering the following. If at a time t in S all the clocks give a short lightflash or something, to show for instance that it's twelve o'clock, then in the S' system this flash will be seen at a time t' at a location x'. Now, in S' the lightflash will be seen sooner (t' smaller) as x' increases, so an observer in S' will conclude that as x' increases the clock actually runs more and more ahead, knowing that the flash means '12 o'clock' and that that '12 o'clock'-signal happens first for larger x'.
Is the statement in my course-book therefore wrong or am I messing something up? (probably the second, but I've thought this through a number of times now and I can't seem to figure it out)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question really is: For events that occur simultaneously in S (the S clocks all strike 12 noon, for example) when do they occur according to S'?

Start with the appropriate Lorentz transformation:
\Delta t' = \gamma(\Delta t - v\Delta x/c^2)

Since \Delta t = 0, this tells you that according to S' a clock at position x (x > 0) in S will strike noon before a clock at the origin (x = 0). (\Delta t' will be negative.)

A way to summarize the clock desynchronization effect is: Moving clocks, synchronized in their rest frame but separated by a distance D along their direction of motion, are not synchronized in the stationary frame; The front clock lags the rear clock by an amount:
T = Dv/c^2.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top