I Are There Always Conditions for Writing Q=CΔT in Heat Transfer Processes?

AI Thread Summary
In heat transfer processes, the equation Q=CΔT applies under specific conditions, particularly when heat capacity C is defined appropriately. In isothermal processes, using this formula can lead to incorrect conclusions, as it implies Q=0, which is not universally true. The relationship between heat transfer and work done complicates the use of a constant C, necessitating a more nuanced understanding in thermodynamics. Heat capacities are redefined in thermodynamics as derivatives of internal energy and enthalpy, allowing for more accurate calculations in varying conditions. These definitions can revert to the simpler freshman physics version under certain conditions, confirming their broader applicability.
FG_313
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
When dealing with heat transfer, there are cases where Q can be expressed by C*ΔT, for some proportionality constant C. However, in isothermal processes for example, this formula would lead to a mistake, for any value of C (because it would imply Q=0, which is not true generally speaking). What about a general process going from an initial state to a final one? Is it always possible to find such C?
Edit: I`ve just realized that I wrote "righting" instead of "writing" in the title. Sorry. <Moderator's note: title edited>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In freshman physics, we learned that, when heat is added to a constant volume system, we can write Q = CΔT, where C is called the heat capacity. However, when we got more deeply into the basics and learned thermodynamics, we found that this elementary approach is no longer adequate (or precise). We found that Q depends on process path and that, if work W is occurring, this changes things. However, we still wanted C to continue to represent a physical property of the material being processed, and not to depend on process path or whether work is occurring. This is dealt with in thermodynamics by changing the definition of C a little. Rather than associating C with the path dependent heat Q, in thermodynamics, we associate C with parameters relating to the state of the material being processed, in particular internal energy U and enthalpy H. We define the heat capacity at constant volume ##C_v## as the derivative of the internal energy U with respect to temperature at constant volume:
$$C_v=\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_v\tag{1}$$
We also found that we could define a heat capacity at constant pressure ##C_p## as the derivative of the enthalpy H with resepct to temperature at constant pressure:$$C_p=\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_p\tag{2}$$
The question is, "do either of these definitions reduce to the more elementary version from freshman physics under any circumstances." The answer is "yes." From the first law of thermodynamics, we find that, for a closed system of constant volume (no work being done), ##Q=\Delta U=C_v\Delta T##, and, for a closed system experiencing a constant pressure change (with ##W=p\Delta v##), ##Q=\Delta H=C_p\Delta T##. Of course, Eqns. 1 and 2 are much more generally applicable than this.
 
  • Like
Likes Andrew Mason and FG_313
Great answer, thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top