Are There Any Geometric or Optical Isomers in Ni(OH)2Cl(NH3)3?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying geometric and optical isomers in the molecule Ni(OH)2Cl(NH3)3, which is a nickel (III) octahedral complex. The initial assessment suggests that the arrangement of atoms around the central Cl atom does not lead to distinct configurations, as any movement results in a similar orientation. Participants are encouraged to visualize the molecule with a square planar bipyramid structure to explore potential isomer variations. By swapping groups in the square plane and axial positions, one can determine the total number of isomers present. The exploration of these configurations is crucial for understanding the isomerism in this complex.
amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
For the molecule \textrm{Ni}\left(\textrm{OH}\right)_{2}\textrm{Cl}\left(\textrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{3}, how do you determine the number of geometric and optical isomers? I first drew the molecule with a central \textrm{Cl} bonded to three \textrm{NH}_{3} molecules and a \textrm{Ni}; the \textrm{Ni} was in turn bonded to two \textrm{OH} molecules. From this, it appeared that no matter how I moved the atoms surrounding the central atom, the configuration would always be the same; it would just be rotated counterclockwise or clockwise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a nickel (III) octahedral complex. Try drawing nickel with a square planar bipyramid around it. There will be four groups in the square plane and two other groups in the axial positions. Switch out the groups to determine how many isomers you have.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top