Area of a bounded region using integration

Click For Summary
To find the area of a bounded region between two arbitrary functions f(x) and g(x) using integration, first identify the intersection points (a,b) and (c,d). The area can be expressed as the integral of the difference between the two functions over the interval defined by these intersection points. Specifically, the area A can be calculated using the formula A = ∫[a to c] (f(x) - g(x)) dx, where f(x) is the upper function and g(x) is the lower function within that interval. If the functions are not explicitly defined, the approach involves setting up piecewise functions based on the behavior of f(x) and g(x) across the interval. This method allows for the generalization of the area calculation for any arbitrary functions.
Steven_Scott
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Member advised that the homework template must be used, not deleted
In Calculus II, we're currently learning how to find the area of a bounded region using integration. My professor wants us to solve a problem where we're given a graph of two arbitrary functions, f(x) and g(x) and their intersection points, labeled (a,b) and (c,d) with nothing else given.

I know how to find set up the integration if I'm given the functions explicitly but these aren't specified. Everything I find in textbooks and on-line only gives examples with specified functions, not arbitrary ones labeled f(x) and g(x).

Can someone please show me how I'd go about setting up a problem like this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Steven_Scott said:
In Calculus II, we're currently learning how to find the area of a bounded region using integration. My professor wants us to solve a problem where we're given a graph of two arbitrary functions, f(x) and g(x) and their intersection points, labeled (a,b) and (b,c) with nothing else given.

I know how to find set up the integration if I'm given the functions explicitly but these aren't specified. Everything I find in textbooks and on-line only gives examples with specified functions, not arbitrary ones labeled f(x) and g(x).

Can someone please show me how I'd go about setting up a problem like this?

If ##f(x) = x^2## and ##g(x) = x ## what would you do and why?

You then need to generalise this approach.
 
  • Like
Likes Steven_Scott
Steven_Scott said:
... where we're given a graph of two arbitrary functions, f(x) and g(x) and their intersection points, labeled (a,b) and (b,c) ...
Is there a typo here? Shouldn't the intersection points be (a,b) and (c,d)?
 
  • Like
Likes Steven_Scott
kuruman said:
Is there a typo here? Shouldn't the intersection points be (a,b) and (c,d)?

You're right.
Thank you.
 
I don't understand how you can possibly be given a formulation that is only for particular functions and not general. E.g for the area delimited by the x-axis, a function f(x) and x = a and x = b for example.
The answer to this question will not be the most neat compressed formula, but one of those more strung-out 'peicewise' mones involving x≥, x≤ etc. that you have surely met and done exercises on, e.g. when they were explaining what what is meant by a function.
 
Last edited:
##f(x)dx## is an elemental area "under the curve" consisting of a rectangle of height ##f(x)## and width ##dx## located at some ##x##.
##g(x)dx## is an elemental area"under the curve" consisting of a rectangle of height ##g(x)## and width ##dx## located at the same ##x##.
##dA=f(x)dx-g(x)dx## is the "area under the curve" difference between ##f(x)dx## and ##g(x)dx## also at the same ##x##.
What is the total "area under the curve" difference in the interval ##x_1 \le x \le x_2##?
Hint Add all the ##dA##'s together and write an expression for the sum in terms of the given symbols.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...