Area of a Parametrized Surface

Differentiate1
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Here's my work: http://i.imgur.com/UMj72Ub.png

I used the surface area differential for a parametrized surface to solve for the area of that paraboloid surface. My friend tried solving this by parametrizing with x and y instead of r and theta which gave him the same answer. I would greatly appreciate it if anyone else can verify if this answer is correct as it looks out of the ordinary.

Thanks,

Differentiate1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've a few typos in there, but it is essentially right.
Some spurious 'r' factors in rr. You don't want the modulus signs around the first mention of rr x rθ.
You should mention the reasoning behind writing z = r2 instead of z = 4-r2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
haruspex said:
You've a few typos in there, but it is essentially right.
Some spurious 'r' factors in rr. You don't want the modulus signs around the first mention of rr x rθ.
You should mention the reasoning behind writing z = r2 instead of z = 4-r2.

Sorry about the part where I wrote z = r2. I essentially set z = 0 and moved the 4 over and got -4 = -x2-y2. Eliminate the negatives and I ended up with 4 = x2+y2 where r = 2. Hence why I set z = r2.

Thanks again!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top