Arrhenius equation problem - converting equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of the Arrhenius equation for reaction rates at two temperatures, specifically comparing the standard form, k2/k1 = e^(Ea/R(1/T1 - 1/T2)), with an alternative equation presented in a paper: k2/k1 = (T2+460)/(T1+460) * 10^((-394)*H*(1/(T2+460)-1/(T1+460))). The latter uses Fahrenheit for temperature and kcal for enthalpy, which complicates direct comparison. Participants express confusion over the temperature ratio (T2+460)/(T1+460) and its derivation, questioning its relevance to Transition State Theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Arrhenius equation and its application in chemical kinetics.
  • Familiarity with temperature conversion between Fahrenheit and Rankine scales.
  • Knowledge of Transition State Theory and its implications on reaction rates.
  • Basic calculus skills for integrating equations and manipulating exponential functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and implications of the Arrhenius equation in chemical kinetics.
  • Learn about temperature conversions and their impact on reaction rate calculations.
  • Study Transition State Theory in detail to understand its application in reaction rate equations.
  • Explore the use of non-SI units in chemical equations and how to convert them properly.
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, chemical engineers, and students studying reaction kinetics who need to understand the nuances of the Arrhenius equation and temperature effects on reaction rates.

eva m
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there

I've been trying to work this out and didn't quite succeed, so I'm hoping someone might help me out a bit.

I've been using the Arrhenius equation to calculate reaction rates at 2 temperatures, so I took the integral and got k2/k1 = e^(Ea/R(1/T1 - 1/T2))
This paper I've been reading (doing similar things as I am) is however suggesting the following equation:
k2/k1 = (T2+460)/(T1+460) * 10^((-394)*H*(1/(T2+460)-1/(T1+460)))

The second equation isn't using SI units, so temperatures are in F and entalphy is in kcal.

I've been trying to convert the second equation into the first one (or vice versa) to check everything is OK and I can't get it to work. My main problem is the first part, (T2+460)/(T1+460).
My calc is a bit rusty, so I'm not sure where I'm going wrong (or if the problem is elsewhere)...

Would really appreciate some help. Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
No idea what you have integrated.

[tex]k_1 = e^{\frac {E_a} {RT_1}}[/tex]

[tex]k_2 = e^{\frac {E_a} {RT_2}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac {k_1} {k_2} = \frac {e^{\frac {E_a} {RT_1}}} {e^{\frac {E_a} {RT_2}}}[/tex]

Just rearrange right side.

I don't see where (T2+460)/(T1+460) could come from (that is, 460 is conversion between Fahrenheit and Rankine scale, but ratio of temperatures before exponential part doesn't make sense to me).

Or are you trying to do something completely different?
 
Thanks for the reply!

Well integrating (and setting T1 & T2 as borders) the equation might be complicating things a bit, but you essentially get the same thing...

Yes, the temperature ratio is what I don't understand, as I have no idea where it could've come from. All the paper says is "Transition State Theory can accurately describe the effect of temperature changes on reaction rates. The equation for the relative rate of reaction at two (Fahrenheit) temperatures T1 and T2 is ..." (and that's the equation I wrote earlier)
- which is not the transition state theory I know, but I might be wrong...

Any ideas?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
94K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K