AS-level SUVAT / Newtonian physics-based question

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJsTeLF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newtonian Suvat
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average total upward force acting on a diver who enters the water at 7.92 m/s and comes to rest 1.6 meters below the surface. The diver's mass is 72 kg, leading to a calculated decelerating force of approximately 1411 N. However, the model answer indicates that the total average upward force is 2117 N, which includes an additional 706 N to counteract the diver's weight due to gravity. This additional force is necessary for the diver to come to a complete stop, highlighting the importance of considering both kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy in the calculations. The discussion emphasizes that understanding buoyancy is not essential to solve the problem, as the upward force must simply exceed the downward gravitational force.
DJsTeLF
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Diver enters the water at 7.92 [ms][/-1] and comes to rest 1.6m below the surface.

Calculate the average total upward force acting on the diver which brings his verticle velocity to zero.

From an earlier part of the questions the divers mass is 72kg.

Homework Equations


Thus far I have solved this by equating the verticle kinetic engery of the diver on entering the water with the work done by the water in decelerating him to a stop.

The answer I get is [average decelerating force]\approx[/1411N]

The model answer however states that the total average upward force is 1411 + 706 = 2117N.

My question is therefore from where do they / should I get the other 706N from?


The Attempt at a Solution


\Delta[/\frac{1}{2}m[v][/2]] = decelerating force x 1.6m<br /> <br /> Decelerating force = 0.5 x 72 x [7.92][/2] / 1.6 = 1411N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DJsTeLF said:
...
From an earlier part of the questions the divers mass is 72kg.
...

My question is therefore from where do they / should I get the other 706N from?

It's weighty problem.
 
gneill said:
It's weighty problem.

Is this meant to be a joke or a hint at the solution?

It did make me consider whether they expect the student to realize that to come to rest the diver would have to be neutrally bouyant in order to properly come to rest under water.

Downward force due to gravity = mass x gravity = 72 x 9.8 = 705.6N

Therefore equivalent upward force would be necessary for diver to come to a stop.

It appears I've found a route to the answer but this seems like a hell-of-an insight for a 16yr old student to have without any 'nudges' towards considering neutral bouyancy in the question??

Comments welcome
 
You don't need the details about buoyancy to solve the problem. All you need to know is that the work done to bring him to a halt has to take into account the change in potential energy due to gravity as well as the kinetic energy he needs to lose. Hence the hint about gravity (okay, it was a joke, too). The result is that there's an extra force acting upward (you don't care about the source) to counteract the downward force due to his weight.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top