Asteroid falling to earth, what will be minimum speed and KE on planet?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum speed and kinetic energy of a 20,000-kg asteroid falling to Earth from a great distance, ignoring atmospheric effects. Participants emphasize using calculus to derive the gravitational force, which is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from Earth's center. The conversation highlights the use of the work-energy principle, specifically integrating the gravitational force to find kinetic energy at impact. There is a focus on avoiding the gravitational constant (G) to simplify the problem, using relationships derived from basic physics principles instead. The approach aims to calculate the kinetic energy as the asteroid reaches the Earth's surface, confirming that the force approaches zero at large distances.
overdrive7
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The gravitational pull of the Earth on an object is inversely proportional to the square of the distance of the object from the center of the earth. At the Earth's surface this force is equal to the object's normal weight mg, where g = 9.8m/s^2, and at large distances, the force is zero. If a 20,000-kg asteroid falls to Earth from a very great distance away, what will be its minimum speed as it strikes the Earth's surface, and how much kinetic energy will it impart to our planet? You can ignore the effects of the Earth's atmosphere


Homework Equations


K=(1/2)(mv2)
g=~1/r^2, where r is the distance from the center of Earth to the asteroid
W=∫Fxdx

The Attempt at a Solution


I've seen a solution where the equation for potential energy (U) is involved, but it seems I'm supposed to solve this using calculus. I'm not quite sure where to start. I'm trying to use the integral of the work formula, but I'm not sure how to relate it to this problem where the gravity is involved. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm glad to see you doing this, Overdrive. One should do it from basics until it gets boring, then use those more powerful formulas.

W=∫Fr*dr should do the trick. Your F will just be the big G formula for gravitational force. Show your work here if you want a check or help!
 
Delphi51 said:
I'm glad to see you doing this, Overdrive. One should do it from basics until it gets boring, then use those more powerful formulas.

W=∫Fr*dr should do the trick. Your F will just be the big G formula for gravitational force. Show your work here if you want a check or help!

Thank you for the reply. By "big G formula", are you referring to the Gm1m2/r^2 formula? If so, is there a way to do it without the big G? I don't think I'm supposed to use the gravitational constant, because that is chapters away from where we are right now in our textbook (ch13 vs ch6).
 
Yes, that is the formula I meant.
The gravitational pull of the Earth on an object is inversely proportional to the square of the distance of the object from the center of the earth. At the Earth's surface this force is equal to the object's normal weight mg, where g = 9.8m/s^2
Could this be suggesting you derive that formula?
F proportional to 1/r² means F = k/r²
At the surface of the Earth this is mg = k/R² where R is the radius of Earth, so k = mgR²
and so F = k*r² becomes F = (mgR²)/r²
(Hopefully this mgR² has the same value as G*m*M.)
It does neatly avoid using G.
 
Thank you! I will use that and find the integral from infinity to the surface of the earth, since it says "at large distances, the force is 0", so the infinity would cancel out and leave the KE when it hits the surface.. I hope that's correct.
 
Sounds good!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top