Astronomy Question: Maximum latitude

mooneyes
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. Taking the latitude of Dublin as 53.3 degrees North, and the tilt of the Earth's axis and the lunar orbit to be 23.5 and 5 degrees respectively, what is the maximum altitude of the Moon as seen from Dublin? What is the maximum altitude as seen from the North pole?



2. Homework Equations , well that's my main question about the question, as such. Are there a few formula that are generally used in basic astrophysics, like there are the equations of motion and kinetic/potential energy, et cetera for mechanics? Not only for like the question posted above, but also for other areas of astronomy, like birghtness of stars, and such? The textbooks I've looked at have had lovely long english-y paragraphs about the sun and whatnot, but I'm not sure where to find a more physics approach to the topic.



3. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you must draw a representation of the earth,the Earth's equator ,the ecliptic the angles etc. (please look attachment)

If we suppose you are on Earth's equator then the celectial equator( which is a projection of the Earth's equator should pass through zenith.
Therefore the maximum altitude of the moon would be 90 degrees - 5 degrees =85 degrees.
If you are in dublin then
53.3-5=48.3

90-48.3=41.7 degrees ,this is the highest altitude of the moon when you are in dublin.
Finally when you are on the north pole ,the highest altitude of the moon is 5 degrees.

Not sure why should i care about the tilt of the Earth's axis,maybe i am wrong
 

Attachments

  • fig 1.jpg
    fig 1.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 489
astrozilla said:
Not sure why should i care about the tilt of the Earth's axis,maybe i am wrong

Well I'm glad you do care! Yes, I see, seems to be more trigonometry work than anything else, thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top