Asymptotic Expansion Exercise: Finding a Gaussian Point Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter MementoMori96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
MementoMori96

Homework Statement



Hi, i have this exercise

Cattura.PNG

and i have to find the asymptotic expansion on a gaussian point .

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I have transformed xt in et ln x in order to have the form used in the formula but ln x is not regular in 0 and it give some problems and moreover it hasn't a maximum . How can i do ? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Cattura.PNG
    Cattura.PNG
    4.8 KB · Views: 837
Physics news on Phys.org
MementoMori96 said:

Homework Statement



Hi, i have this exercise

View attachment 213965
and i have to find the asymptotic expansion on a gaussian point .

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I have transformed xt in et ln x in order to have the form used in the formula but ln x is not regular in 0 and it give some problems and moreover it hasn't a maximum . How can i do ? Thanks

By a simple change of variable you can express your function ##f(t) = \int_0^{\infty} x^{t-1} e^{-\pi x} \, dx## in terms of the standard Gamma function
$$ \Gamma(z) \equiv \int_0^{\infty} y^{z-1} e^{-y} \, dy$$
Then, you can find methods for asymptotic expansion of ##\Gamma## in hundreds of web pages (or good old-fashioned books). For example, the link http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GammaFunction.html
has everything you need.
 
I suggest to substitute ##y=\pi x## in order to sort out the constants in your equation. Then you are left with the gamma function. What do you know about it, resp. which approximations are you allowed to use? If none, then look up proofs on the internet for its asymptotic behavior.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top