Atomic Energy Levels - Calculating the Minimum Energy of Light Emitted

AI Thread Summary
To determine the longest wavelength of light emitted from an atom, the formula λ = hc/E is used, where E is the minimum energy calculated as 2.1 eV. The resulting longest wavelength is approximately 5.91 × 10^-7 m. There is confusion regarding whether to use the energy difference between the ionization level and n=4, which is 1.6 eV, as the minimum energy emitted. It is clarified that a transition must occur for photon emission, and the energy of the emitted photon is calculated by subtracting the lower energy level from the upper one. Understanding these energy transitions is crucial for accurate calculations in atomic energy levels.
LovePhys
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=51788&stc=1&d=1349951739.jpg

Determine the longest wavelength of light emitted from this atom.

Homework Equations


\lambda=\frac{hc}{E}


The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the lowest energy of the light emitted: E_{min}=2.1(eV)
Then the longest wavelength would be: \lambda_{max}=\frac{hc}{E_{min}}=\frac{4.14×10^{-15}×3×10^{8}}{2.1}≈5.91×10^{-7}(m)

What confused me is the energy difference between the ionization level and n=4 is even smaller than 2.1 eV: 1.6-0=1.6(eV). Am I going to take this energy difference as the minimum energy emitted? Also, can you please point out if the way I take the absolute value of the energy levels and subtract them is correct?

Thank you very much.
LovePhys
 

Attachments

  • 15.jpg
    15.jpg
    17.7 KB · Views: 497
Physics news on Phys.org
A transition is necessary for a photon to be emitted. If the energy of an electron is raised to the 0 eV level it will be free of the atom and will not be available for further transitions. The energy of the photon as it transist from the upper energy level to the lower is Eupper - Elower so the two negatives makes the lower energy value positive.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top