Insights Atomic positioning with DNA hinges - Comments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a new PF Insights post on "Atomic Positioning with DNA Hinges," which has sparked excitement about the potential for a new category in physics, particularly in nano-mechanics. Participants express enthusiasm for the idea of building nanobots and speculate about the future of DIY kits for such technology. The conversation references existing research on nanoscale motors and DNA origami, highlighting the advancements in supramolecular chemistry and the potential for DNA nanostructures to perform complex functions. There is a mix of humor and creativity in imagining practical applications, such as nanorobotic tools. However, some participants note that while the precision of molecular positioning is impressive, claims about achieving "Bohr radius" accuracy may be overstated. The overall sentiment reflects a strong interest in the future implications of these technologies and their potential to address various challenges in science and engineering.
klotza
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
80
Reaction score
113
klotza submitted a new PF Insights post

Atomic Positioning with DNA Hinges

alexdna-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick and Greg Bernhardt
Biology news on Phys.org
This is going to be a new category in physics soon? Nano-mechanics? It makes me want to build nanobots!
 
jerromyjon said:
This is going to be a new category in physics soon? Nano-mechanics? It makes me want to build nanobots!

You're not the only one interested in nanobots: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/making-a-voltron-out-of-dna.807896/ (of course, the DNA origami nanobot in that article only looks like a robot, but doesn't actually do anything). Here's a news piece from Nature discussion chemists efforts to build nanoscale parts to generate molecular scale motion: http://www.nature.com/news/the-tini...cale-motors-rotors-switches-and-pumps-1.18262 The article focuses mostly on supramolecular chemistry, though one could imagine trying to design DNA nanostructures capable of such functions as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
jerromyjon said:
It makes me want to build nanobots!
I could see DIY kits out by Christmas :biggrin:
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
I could see DIY kits out by Christmas :biggrin:
I was thinking the same thing! I just couldn't think of anything other than nanorobotic drain opener, and I doubt that's on anyone but the plumber's x-mas list.

Oooh, nanorobotic paint scrapers, too! I could use a few bucketfuls of those. :eek: I suppose they should collect lead as well...

Why can't I think of anything fun...
 
Last edited:
aroc91 said:
I haven't seen anything more recent on the topic.
Me either. Anything in this realm attracts my interest! Having such fine angle control the first thing I'd want to make is atomic pinwheels to see if we can figure out how to make it do something...
 
Three statisticians are playing darts in a bar. The first steps up to the line, throws his dart and misses wide left. The second statistician takes his turn, and misses wide right, at which point the third statistician yells "bullseye!"

After having time to read the full paper, this is my impression of the claim that the authors can position molecules with "Bohr radius" accuracy. Yes, they can construct structures where they molecules with an accuracy of 0.04 nm, but the precision with which they can place the molecules is an order of magnitude larger (~0.5 nm from the authors' estimates). The result is still impressive and useful, though claims of Bohr radius resolution may be a bit overblown.
 
  • #10
I wasn't thinking of positioning of atoms as into piece together parts, like on a workbench. I was thinking of the DNA backbone as the "bench" to assemble pieces within itself, similar to protein mechanics. I am quite fuzzy on what actually is state of the "art", as Greg called it... I think there might be a lot more going on behind the scenes or there should be! I can only imagine how much potential this field has and I can't make out many challenges it couldn't help overcome.
 
  • #11
Dear staff
i wowed a lot about this topic
thanks alot
 
  • #12
The possible places this could lead to in 20 years blows my mind. Hope I'm around to see it developed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Back
Top