Atwood Machine Related Question

AI Thread Summary
To determine the force the window-washer must exert on the rope to accelerate himself and the platform at 0.84 m/s², the relationship between the forces and tension in the rope must be understood. The discussion clarifies that the tension in the rope is effectively halved due to the pulley system, meaning the force exerted by the washer is not a direct 1:1 ratio with the net force acting on him and the platform. When moving at a constant speed of 2.3 m/s, the force he exerts on the rope equals the weight of both himself and the platform, as acceleration is zero. The free body diagram should reflect two upward tension forces acting on the platform and the washer, reinforcing that T1 equals T2. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
Jimmy25
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 59-kg window-washer stands on a 17-kg platform. The platform is fixed to a rope that passes over a pulley attached to the ceiling, which allows the window-washer to raise himself and the platform. (a) To accelerate himself and the platform at a rate of 0.84 m/s2, with what force must he pull on the rope? (b) When his velocity reaches 2.3 m/s, he pulls so he and the platform go up at a constant speed. What force is he exerting on the rope?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I thought since there was only one pulley the ratio of the force of the window washer pulling on the rope to the net force due to tension on him and the platform would be 1:1. Evidently this is not the case. Is the force applied by the washer on the rope halfed by the pulley. If so why is this the case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of it this way:

The tension in the rope pulls upward on the platform and on the hands of the man pulling on the rope. So, the tension pulls upward at two points, meaning you only need half the force you would need if the rope only pulled at one point.
 
So what would my FBD look like in this case?

I have T1 pulling up on the platform and Fg pulling down on the platform.

Now, what I had before was Fa pulling down on the other side of the pulley and T2 acting upwards canceling with T1. But this is not correct.

Could you explain how the forces would look on the other side of the pulley?
 
In your free body diagram, you have the rope pulling upward at two points, on the platform and the man.

This means that in your free body diagram, you will have two forces pulling upward, T_1 and T_2 with T_1=T_2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top