Why Does the Fourier Transform of Autocorrelation Equal the ESD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dionysian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Autocorrelation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function and the energy spectral density (ESD) of the original signal, referencing the Wiener-Khinchin theorem. This theorem states that the power spectral density (PSD) is the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function, highlighting that a rapidly decaying autocorrelation indicates high-frequency components in the signal. The conversation emphasizes the intuitive understanding of this relationship, particularly how a sharply peaked autocorrelation results in a broad spectrum. Participants suggest consulting textbooks for a deeper mathematical derivation and further insights into the theorem's implications in various fields. Overall, the discussion underscores the significance of the Wiener-Khinchin theorem in signal processing and related disciplines.
dionysian
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Does anyone here have a good explanation of why the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function equals the ESD of the the original signal. It kind of make sense intutively because functions that have a autocorrelation that drops of quickly are high frenquency and the Fourier transform of that resulting function will obviuosly have a wide bandwidth but it seems like there should but a analytic derivation of this.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
dionysian said:
Does anyone here have a good explanation of why the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function equals the ESD of the the original signal. It kind of make sense intutively because functions that have a autocorrelation that drops of quickly are high frenquency and the Fourier transform of that resulting function will obviuosly have a wide bandwidth but it seems like there should but a analytic derivation of this.
Please be careful: ESD and PSD (energy and power spectral density) are not interchangeable.
You are inquiring about the Wiener-Khinchin theorem, which states that the PSD is the Fourier Transform (FT) of the autocorrelation function (and vice versa). Here is an online mathematical derivation:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Wiener-KhinchinTheorem.html"
The W-K is intuitively reasonable. It predicts, for instance, that a sharply peaked autocorrelation function R transforms to a broad power density spectrum. Think about a random noise signal for which R is a delta function; the FT of a delta is a uniform spectrum, and indeed random noise has a white spectrum. Other examples are also easily imagined.
I recommend that you check out the discussion in a textbook for more details. The W-K theorem is discussed in every text on Fourier transforms, signal processing, and if you are a physicist, statistical mechanics (because of the interest in characterizing random fluctuations).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ahhh haa... I just found that in one of my books. Thanks. I just needed someone to point me in the right direction.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top