Autonomous differential equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a differential equation modeling the volume of water in a conical pond, influenced by a constant inflow rate and evaporation proportional to the surface area. The derived equation is dV/dt = k - απ(3a/πh)^(2/3)V^(2/3), where α is the evaporation coefficient. The equilibrium depth of water is expressed as L = (h/a)√(k/(απ)), and it is established that this equilibrium is stable since the derivative of the right-hand side of the equation is negative at the equilibrium point. A condition for preventing overflow is that the equilibrium depth must not exceed the cone's depth, ensuring L ≤ h. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for managing water levels in the pond effectively.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
I just need some help with this problem. Thank you.

"A pond forms as water collects in a conical depression of radius a and depth h. Suppose that water flows in at a constant rate k and is lost through evaporation at a rate proportional to the surface area.

(a) Show that the volume V(t) of water in the pond at time t satisfies the differential equation

\frac{dV}{dt} = k - \alpha \pi \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{2/3}

where \alpha is the coefficient of evaporation.

(b) Find the equilibrium depth of water in the pond. Is the equilibrium asymptotically stable?

(c) Find a condition that must be satisfied if the pond is not to overflow."

My work:

(a)

Consider the following

\frac{dV}{dt} = k - \alpha \pi \underbrace{\left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{2/3}} _{r^2}

where r is the radius of the pond. Thus, we have

r^2 = \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{2/3}

r^3 = \frac{3aV}{\pi h}

V = \frac{1}{3} \pi r^2 \left( \frac{hr}{a} \right) = \frac{1}{3} \pi r^2 L

which satisfies the differential equation.

(b)

\frac{dV}{dt} = 0

k - \alpha \pi r^2 = 0

r = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}}

Then, the equilibrium depth of water in the pond is

L = \frac{h}{a} \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}}

In this particular case, I don't know how to show whether or not it is asymptotically stable.

(c)

L = \frac{h}{a} \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}} \leq h


Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An equilibrium depth of water in the pond implies that there is an equilibrium volume. Thus, a direction field can show whether or not it is asymptotically stable, which is what I have at

http://mygraph.cjb.net/

Here are the (random) values that I used to plot it:

\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} k = 1 \\ \alpha = 0.6 \\ a = 0.3 \\ h = 0.5 \end{array} \right.

Based on this information, I'd say the equilibrium is asymptotically stable.

Thanks anyway
 
Thank you.



Great work so far! For part (b), we can determine the stability of the equilibrium by analyzing the sign of the derivative of the right-hand side of the differential equation at the equilibrium point. In this case, we have

\frac{d}{dV} \left( k - \alpha \pi \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{2/3} \right) = -\frac{2}{3} \alpha \pi \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} V ^{-1/3}

Substituting in the equilibrium point r = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}}, we get

\frac{d}{dV} \left( k - \alpha \pi r^2 \right) = -\frac{2}{3} \alpha \pi \left( \frac{3a}{\pi h} \right) ^{2/3} \left( \frac{k}{\alpha \pi} \right) ^{-1/3} = -2\left( \frac{a}{h} \right) ^{2/3}

Since \left( \frac{a}{h} \right) ^{2/3} is always positive, we can see that the derivative is always negative at the equilibrium point. This means that the equilibrium point is stable, but we cannot determine if it is asymptotically stable without further information about the initial conditions.

For part (c), you are correct in stating that the condition for the pond to not overflow is

L = \frac{h}{a} \sqrt{\frac{k}{\alpha \pi}} \leq h

This means that the equilibrium depth of water must be less than or equal to the depth of the cone. If the equilibrium depth is greater than the cone's depth, then the pond will overflow.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
951
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
966
Replies
4
Views
952
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top