Autonomous differential equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the autonomous differential equation dy/dt = e^y - 1, where the user is tasked with plotting f(y) versus y and identifying critical points. The user notes that for y_0 < 0, the function is decreasing and concave down, while for y_0 > 0, it is increasing and concave up. The critical point at y = 0 is initially perceived as semistable, but the textbook classifies it as unstable. After some clarification, the user acknowledges the misunderstanding regarding the stability of the critical point.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Consider the autonomous differential equation that follows

\frac{dy}{dt} = e^y - 1, \qquad -\infty &lt; y_0 &lt; \infty \mbox{.}

I'm supposed to plot f(y) versus y, and determine the critical (equilibrium) points, and classify each one as asymptotically stable or unstable. Anyhow, you can find my plot at

http://mygraph.cjb.net/

which gives

y_0 &lt; 0 \Longrightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} y^{\prime} &lt; 0 &amp; \mbox{(y is decreasing),} \\ y^{\prime \prime} &lt; 0 &amp; \mbox{(y is concave down),} \end{array} \right.

and

y_0 &gt; 0 \Longrightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} y^{\prime} &gt; 0 &amp; \mbox{(y is increasing),} \\ y^{\prime \prime} &gt; 0 &amp; \mbox{(y is concave up).} \end{array} \right.

However, I picture the critical point y = \phi (t) = 0 to be semistable. The book says it is unstable, but I really can't find my mistake.

Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
thiago_j said:
Consider the autonomous differential equation that follows

\frac{dy}{dt} = e^y - 1, \qquad -\infty &lt; y_0 &lt; \infty \mbox{.}



y_0 &lt; 0 \Longrightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} y^{\prime} &lt; 0 &amp; \mbox{(y is decreasing),} \\ y^{\prime \prime} &lt; 0 &amp; \mbox{(y is concave down),} \end{array} \right.

and

y_0 &gt; 0 \Longrightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} y^{\prime} &gt; 0 &amp; \mbox{(y is increasing),} \\ y^{\prime \prime} &gt; 0 &amp; \mbox{(y is concave up).} \end{array} \right.

However, I picture the critical point y = \phi (t) = 0 to be semistable. The book says it is unstable, but I really can't find my mistake.

When a negative number decreases its absolute value increases so it goes away further from the origin.

ehild
 
Absolutely! I see it now. Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top