Available Wind Energy Calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of available wind energy, specifically the formula for power harvested from free-streaming wind, P=1/2QU^2_infinite. The mass flow rate, Q, is defined using the area of a disc, A_d, rather than the ambient air area, A_infinite. This choice is justified because only the air passing through the disc can be harvested, despite the presence of more total air. The conservation of mass is acknowledged, but the focus remains on the air that can be theoretically captured. The clarification emphasizes the practical aspect of energy capture in wind energy calculations.
keith0101
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Why we take area of disc, instead of area of ambient air in the assumption of mass flow rate when calculating the available wind energy? Isn't it a contradiction to conservation of mass?
For the avaliable power to be harvested in free-streaming wind:
P=1/2QU^2_infinite (Q: mass flow rate, U_infinite: velocity of free-streaming wind)
And
Q is defined as: p x U_infinite x A_d. (p: density of air, A_d: Area of disc)

I cannot understand the reason of taking the area of disc, A_d, instead of area of ambient air, A_infinite, in the assumption of Q, since under the conservation of mass:
p*U_infinite*A_infinite = p*U_d*A_d = p*U_w*A_w
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Keith.

keith0101 said:
here in the 2nd slide
What 2nd slide? What presentation? Please always provide links to your source material when posting on PF (and to avoid copyright violations). Thanks.
 
Hi,

For 2nd slide I mean the equation of avalible power in wind, which is:
P=1/2QU^2_infinite (Q: mass flow rate, U_infinite: velocity of free-streaming wind)
And
Q is defined as: p x U_infinite x A_d. (p: density of air, A_d: Area of disc)

I cannot understand the reason of taking the area of disc, A_d, instead of area of ambient air, A_infinite, in the assumption of Q, since under the conservation of mass:
p*U_infinite*A_infinite = p*U_d*A_d = p*U_w*A_w
 
Please post links to your sources for that material, Keith, or your post will be deleted for a copyright violation.

UPDATE - it appears that the OP's solution was to delete the attachments...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
You use disk area because the only air you can harvest is that which flows through the disk. Yes, there's much more total air power, but you don't care about the air flowing around the disk, you only care about the air that you could theoretically capture.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top