Average Force on Wall from Ice Cubes' Impact

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average force exerted on a wall by ice cubes impacting it after sliding down a ski-jump track. Each ice cube, weighing 5.30 g, descends a vertical distance of 1.40 m and strikes the wall at an angle of 40.0° with a calculated velocity of 6.84 m/s. The correct approach involves using conservation of energy to determine the initial velocity, leading to a horizontal component of 5.24 m/s. Participants emphasize the need to accurately resolve the velocity components and apply trigonometry correctly. Ultimately, the average force can be determined once the correct impact velocities are established.
SamTsui86
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Small ice cubes, each of mass 5.30 g, slide down a frictionless ski-jump track in a steady stream, as shown in Figure P6.71. Starting from rest, each cube moves down through a net vertical distance of y = 1.40 m and leaves the bottom end of the track at an angle of 40.0° above the horizontal. At the highest point of its subsequent trajectory, the cube stikes a vertical wall and rebounds with half the speed it had upon impact. If 10.0 cubes strike the wall per second, what average force is exerted on the wall?

p6-71.gif


I don't even know how to begin, can anyone give me some hints?
 

Attachments

  • p6-71.gif
    p6-71.gif
    14.1 KB · Views: 371
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by figuring out how fast an ice cube is going when it hits the wall. I think you can do that part.
 
Last edited:
ok, the ice hits the wall at Vf = 6.84 m/s Vfx = 5.24 m/s and Vfy = 4.4 m/s
 
SamTsui86 said:
ok, the ice hits the wall at Vf = 6.84 m/s Vfx = 5.24 m/s and Vfy = 4.4 m/s
If the ice hits the wall at the highest point of its trajectory, it must be moving horizontally.
6.84m/s looks too big for the final velocity. How did you get that?
 
Last edited:
I use the conservation of energy to figure out the initial velocity as it leave the track so

KE + PE top = KE + PE final
0 + mgh = 1/2mv^2 + 0
v= 5.24 m/s

then since the angle is 40 degree i did 5.24/cos40 to get 6.84 m/s
 
SamTsui86 said:
I use the conservation of energy to figure out the initial velocity as it leave the track so

KE + PE top = KE + PE final
0 + mgh = 1/2mv^2 + 0
v= 5.24 m/s

then since the angle is 40 degree i did 5.24/cos40 to get 6.84 m/s
The first part is good. That is the total velocity. The horizontal component will be less than the total, and the vertical component will be less than the total. You have the right trig term for the problem, but in the wrong place. Fix that and find the velocity at the highest point of the trajectory.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top