Average height of molecules in a box as a function of temperature

Kilian Stenning
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A circular cylinder of height H is filled with monatomic gas molecules at temperature T. The cylinder stands on the surface of the Earth so that the gas molecules are subject to the gravitational field g.

(a) Find the average height, z , of the molecules in the cylinder as a function of temperature. (Hint: The probability of finding a molecule at height z is governed by the Boltzmann distribution). Show that for

T → 0, z = 0 , and for T → ∞ , z = H/2 .

Homework Equations


f(z) = Cexp(-mgh/kt)
<z> =∫ z fz dz/∫ fz dz

The Attempt at a Solution


let B=mg/kT
Ive got an answer for <z> to be (1/B)*(1-(e^(-BH))*(BH+1))/(1-e^(-BH))
To get the limits I've tried to use l'hopitals rule w.r.t T but I can't seem to get the right answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Kilian, :welcome:

The brackets tend to make it hard to read. $$
(1/B)\ * \ (1\ \ -\ \ (\exp(-BH))*(BH+1)\ \ \ )\ \quad /\quad (1-\exp (-BH))
$$Do I see $$ <Z> \ = {kT\over mg} \ \
{ 1 - \left ({mgh\over kT}+1\right ) e^{-{mgh\over kT}} \over
1 - e^{-{mgh\over kT} }} \quad ?$$
In which case I see the ##T\rightarrow 0## limit, but not the other one !
 
For the T → ∞ case, you will need to use l'Hopital's rule twice. Or you can expand the exponentials to second order in BH = mgH/(kT).
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
thanks got it now!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top