Average potential and kinetic energy of SHO

mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
I am using Frenches book on waves and have a question. You have a standard driven damped oscillator and I am suppose to find the average potential and kinetic energy of it. They are both similar so I will just use the potential for example. I took \frac{1}{T}\int^T_0 \frac{1}{2}KX^2 dt Where X=Cos(\omega t-\rho) I solved the resulting integral with half angle formulas but found my answer to be a bit messy, is that the correct way of getting the average kinetic energy or am I missing something here? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a trick to doing integrals of cos²(t). First, you should know that:

sin²(t)+cos²(t) = 1 for all t.

Therefore,

\int _a ^b (\cos ^2 (t) + \sin ^2 (t))dt = b-a = \int _a ^b \cos ^2 (t)dt + \int _a ^b \sin ^2 (t)dt

Also, you should know that

\int \limits_T \cos ^2 (t)dt = \int \limits_T \sin ^2 (t)dt

where T is one period. Therefore, since your average potential energy will be taken over one period (T = b-a), you can conclude that:

\int _a ^b (\cos ^2 (t) + \sin ^2 (t))dt = \int \limits_T (\cos ^2 (t) + \sin ^2 (t))dt = \int \limits_T (\cos ^2 (t) + \cos ^2 (t))dt = 2\int \limits_T \cos ^2 (t)dt=T
\int _a ^b \cos ^2 (t)dt = (1/2)T

Now about your question concerning average kinetic energy. Your system is driven, so you have to account for the added energy from the driver and also the loss of energy from the damping. What I think you should do is take your differential equation of motion and find the function of velocity wrt time and find the average kinetic energy using a similar method.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top