AZING!Calculating Vacuum Buoyancy: Maximum Weight a Vacuum Cleaner Can Lift

  • Thread starter Thread starter je55ica7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum weight a vacuum cleaner can lift, the pressure difference between the atmosphere and the vacuum inside the hose must be calculated. Using the formula F = PA, where P is atmospheric pressure (approximately 101325 Pa) and A is the area of the hose, the calculations reveal that the vacuum can lift a weight equivalent to a 6 kg brick. The diameter of the hose is 2.75 cm, which contributes to the area used in the force calculation. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding pressure dynamics in vacuum systems. Overall, a powerful vacuum can exert significant force, comparable to natural phenomena like tornadoes.
je55ica7
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
A very powerful vacuum cleaner has a hose 2.75 cm in diameter. With no nozzle on the hose, what is the weight of the heaviest brick that the cleaner can lift?

So I need to find the pressure and then multiply by the area of the hose... but if P= density*g*h... would I use the density for air? What would the height be?

Am I approaching this the right way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
je55ica7 said:
A very powerful vacuum cleaner has a hose 2.75 cm in diameter. With no nozzle on the hose, what is the weight of the heaviest brick that the cleaner can lift?

So I need to find the pressure and then multiply by the area of the hose... but if P= density*g*h... would I use the density for air? What would the height be?

Am I approaching this the right way?
The 'very powerful' means that it produces practically a perfect vacuum in the hose. So you have to find the total force at the hose opening, assuming that the pressure inside the hose is 0,

One atm = 101325 Pa (N/m^2)

Use F = PA where A = area of hose opening. You don't need to know the density of the air.

AM
 
So I assume the pressure is equal to 1 atm? Or 0? I'm confused... If it was zero then the Force is 0...
 
oh wait, nevermind... i got it! thanks!
 
je55ica7 said:
oh wait, nevermind... i got it! thanks!
I get:

F_{net} = P_{atm}A_{hose} - P_{hose}A_{hose}

F_{net} = 1.01325e5 * 5.94(e-4) N - 0 = 59.6 N

or the weight of a 6 kg. brick. This is a force that would accelerate a 6 kg brick at 9.8 m/sec^2. Imagine a tornado 'hose' the size of a house and you can see why a tornado can send cars sailing through the air.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top