Balancing Van der Waals force with a spring

creemore
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An AFM tip has a spring constant k, a colloidal bead with radius r is glues onto the cantilever tip. Derive an expression and plot the deformation of the cantilever spring, Δx, as a function of distance the tip of the cantilever is moved towards another bead of the same radius.

Homework Equations



The cantilever tip can be treated as a Hookean spring. So Fspring = -kΔx

The non-retarded Van der Waals interaction free energy between two spheres of the same radius is:

W = -AR/(12D)

where D is the distance between the spheres, R is the radius of the spheres, and A is the Hamaker constant.

The Van der Waals force is simply the derivative of the potential w.r.t. D:

Fvan = AR/(12D2)

The Attempt at a Solution



The question seems fairly straight forward. At equilibrium, Fspring = Fv, so

-kΔx = AR/(12D2)

we can say D is the distance the cantilever tip is manual moved (z), plus the distance the spring is stretched because of VDW interaction.

-kΔx = AR/(12(z+x)2)

For some reason, I can't solve for Δx as a function of z. I feel like I'm missing some trivial step, and would appreciate any help with a solution.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
creemore said:
-kΔx = AR/(12(z+x)2)
Should that read -kΔx = AR/(12(z+Δx)2)?
If so, can't you just multiply it out to get a cubic? If Δx can be assumed small c.w. z then you can approximate it thus:
-kΔx = AR/(12z2(1+Δx/z)2) ≈ AR/(12z2(1+2Δx/z)) ≈ AR(1-2Δx/z)/(12z2)
That now being linear in Δx, solve in the obvious way.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top