Band bending in a thin film semiconductor

AI Thread Summary
Thin semiconductor films (4-15 nm) formed on stainless steel through electrochemical methods are believed to exhibit band bending at the passive film/electrolyte interface. The user asserts that applying potential to the stainless steel electrode adjusts the Fermi level, indicating band bending is present. A friend argues against this, suggesting that the nano-scale thickness prevents band bending. However, Mott-Schottky measurements indicate that band bending should occur, with a carrier density of 10E20-10E21 cm-3. The discussion seeks clarity on the validity of both viewpoints regarding band bending in thin film semiconductors.
fuelcell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello!

There're very thin (4-15 nm) semiconductor films (passive film) formed on stainless steel by electrochemical method. In a electrochemical cell, I applied potential on stainless steel electrode to adjust Fermi level of the semiconductor passive film. I think that band bending take place in the semiconductor passive film (at the interface of passive film/electrolyte solution).

However, one of my friend think there would be no band bending in the thin layer (4-15 nm level), due to the nano-scale.

I think there's band bending take places. But I don't know his view point is right or not, please help me. Appreciate all answers!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
fuelcell said:
Hello!

There're very thin (4-15 nm) semiconductor films (passive film) formed on stainless steel by electrochemical method. In a electrochemical cell, I applied potential on stainless steel electrode to adjust Fermi level of the semiconductor passive film. I think that band bending take place in the semiconductor passive film (at the interface of passive film/electrolyte solution).

However, one of my friend think there would be no band bending in the thin layer (4-15 nm level), due to the nano-scale.

I think there's band bending take places. But I don't know his view point is right or not, please help me. Appreciate all answers!

Sounds more like schoolwork than a friendly debate at the local pub. We don't answer schoolwork questions here for you, but can try to help if you seem to have done much of the work.

What course is this for? What is your textbook, and what other learning resources are you given in the course? Is this a lab class, or mostly textbook-based?

What semiconductor are you using, at what doping level, and how are you making contact to it?
 
Thank you, Berkeman.

It's a stainless steel corrosion research in a lab. The passive films consist of Fe/Cr oxide, behave n-type semiconductor. One side of the passive film contact with stainless steel, the other side contact with aqueous solution. According to the Mott-Schottky measurement result, band bending must take place at the interface. The carrier density is 10E20-10E21 cm-3 level.

I don't know if there's a theory supporting his view point - band bending can not take place in a thin layer semiconductor due to the nano-scale.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top