Basic doubt in thermodynamics 2nd law

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around interpretations and implications of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, particularly in the context of closed systems and energy transformations. Participants explore concepts related to potential energy, entropy, and the nature of energy exchanges in thermodynamic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that in a closed system with no energy inflow or outflow, potential energy continuously decreases, questioning where this energy is converted to.
  • Others argue that the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the entropy of a closed system never decreases, challenging the notion that potential energy must decrease.
  • A participant questions the definition of a closed system, suggesting that energy may still be exchanged even if mass is not, and raises the concept of an isolated system.
  • Concerns are raised about a quoted statement that claims potential energy in a closed system must always be less than its initial state, with participants pointing out logical inconsistencies in this assertion.
  • Examples are provided, such as a ball rolling up a hill, to illustrate that potential energy can increase in isolated systems, countering earlier claims.
  • Some participants reference common definitions of entropy, including thermodynamic and information entropy, to clarify misunderstandings related to energy exchanges and entropy.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the perceived inconsistency in widely accepted explanations of the Second Law, suggesting that many sources may be incorrect.
  • Examples of energy conversion in practical scenarios, such as a watchspring-driven watch and energy use in organisms, are discussed to illustrate the relationship between potential energy and entropy.
  • Participants note that energy dissipation as heat is a significant factor in energy transformations, emphasizing the role of entropy in these processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the Second Law of Thermodynamics and its implications for potential energy and entropy. There is no consensus on the correctness of the quoted statements or the definitions of closed and isolated systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in definitions and assumptions regarding energy exchanges, potential energy, and entropy, indicating that the discussion may depend on specific contexts and interpretations.

aditya23456
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
I ve read that according to 2nd law,in a closed system where there's no inflow and outflow of energy,the potential energy of such system continuously decreases...
So where does/ what is this energy converted to.?
 
Science news on Phys.org
aditya23456 said:
I ve read that according to 2nd law,in a closed system where there's no inflow and outflow of energy,the potential energy of such system continuously decreases...
So where does/ what is this energy converted to.?

I think you might have misquoted and/or misunderstood the 2nd law! The Second Law of Thermodynamics has been written in many different forms, but they all say something like this:

The entropy of a macrostate of a closed system never decreases.

I don't know of any law that says the potential energy of a closed system must decrease. For example, consider an ideal box of ideal gas molecules in thermal equilibrium at constant temperature. Thermodynamics says the total potential energy of that system is constant.
 
according to 2nd law,in a closed system where there's no inflow and outflow of energy,

What do you mean by this?

Are you trying to describe a closed system which means there is no inflow or outflow of mass? Energy may, however be exchanged.

Or are you adding the extra restriction to make the system isolated?

Either way if your intention is to restrict energy exchange so that the total energy of the system is constant, are you trying to describe the idea that lead to the 'heat death of the universe' where potential energy is converted to kinetic energy at maximum entropy?
 
It has been stated so--
"In all energy exchanges if no energy energy enters or leaves the system,the potential energy of state is always less than that of initial state.This is commonly referred as entropy"
Is this right.?
 
What do you mean by this?
"In all energy exchanges if no energy energy enters or leaves the system [...]
What is exchanged, if nothing is exchanged?

An isolated system can increase its potential energy. Think of a fast-moving ball, rolling up a hill (with gravity) and coming to a rest there. Earth+Ball increased the potential energy, while the system "earth+ball" could be isolated from the rest of the universe in this hypothetical experiment.
 
aditya23456 said:
It has been stated so--
"In all energy exchanges if no energy energy enters or leaves the system,the potential energy of state is always less than that of initial state.This is commonly referred as entropy"
Is this right.?

Whoever said this has absolutely no idea what he/she is talking about.

  1. The quote defines "energy exchange" as an interaction of an isolated system with itself in a way that does not exchange energy. That's not a useful definition.
  2. As written, the quote says the potential energy of a system's state is always less than that of its initial state. That means the state's initial potential energy is less than itself, which means -1 = 0.
  3. Let's assume the quote meant to say "the potential energy of [a final] state is always less than that of [an] initial state." That is false. (The ball rolling up a hill is, IMO, a clear and simple counterexample.)
  4. Nothing in the quote has any relation to entropy.

Here are some common definitions of entropy:

Old thermodynamic entropy (Boltzmann)

New thermodynamic entropy (Gibbs)

Information entropy (Shannon)

Quantum entropy (von Neumann)
 
Umm..but just google what I ve quoted,u'll find many links where the 2nd law of thermodynamics is explained so..That's the reason I felt some inconsistancy with general accepted law...so this manifests that all the links which stated so are wrong.! Isn't it..?
 
one the link gives following example--
A watchspring-driven
watch will run until the potential energy
in the spring is converted, and not
again until energy is reapplied to the
spring to rewind it. A car that has run
out of gas will not run again until you walk 10 miles to a gas station and refuel
the car. Once the potential energy
locked in carbohydrates is converted
into kinetic energy (energy in use or
motion), the organism will get no more
until energy is input again. In the process of energy transfer, some
energy will dissipate as heat. Entropy is
a measure of disorder: cells are NOT
disordered and so have low entropy.
The flow of energy maintains order and
life. Entropy wins when organisms cease to take in energy and die.
THANKS FOR INFO THOUGH,i'll read them out now..
 
These are just examples where potential or chemical energy is converted into heat, which is usually not reversible in everyday applications.
The important part here is the heat (which usually has high entropy per energy, compared to other energy forms).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K