How Does Time Dilation Affect Clocks on the Concorde?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time difference between two atomic clocks, one on the Concorde and one at rest on Earth, due to time dilation during a flight from North America to Europe. The elapsed time for the trip is determined by dividing the distance of 8000 km by the speed of 375 m/s. The time dilation effect is calculated using the equation Δt_E = γ(Δt_S), where γ is the Lorentz factor. The challenge arises from the small value of v/c, which complicates calculations as it approaches zero for standard calculators. The participant explores using a binomial approximation to address this issue, reflecting on past methods of calculation.
mindarson
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Concorde traveled 8000 km between 2 places in North American and Europe at an average speed of 375 m/s. What is the total difference in time between 2 similar atomic clocks, one on the airplane and one at rest on Earth during a one-way trip? Consider only time dilation and ignore other effects like Earth's rotation.



Homework Equations



Δt_E = γ(Δt_S), γ = [1-(v/c)^2]^.5


The Attempt at a Solution



Here's my thinking: I can find the elapsed time during a one-way trip as measured from Earth frame by dividing the distance (8000 km) by the speed (375 m/s). Then, since the airplane and its clock are moving relative to Earth, the elapsed time interval will be smaller as measured from Earth frame. So I use the equation above.

The problem is that v/c is WAY too small even for a scientific calculator, which just treats it as zero. What can I do with this problem? I tried a binomial approximation, but that didn't help much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gamma is approx 1 -(.5)*(v/c)^2, where v = 3.75*10^2 and c = 3*10^8, so you can get v/c = f*10^(-6), and can easily get f using you calculator. This is the type of thing we used to do on a sliderule, way back in the Stone Age.

RGV
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top