Basis states, matrix elements and angular momentum

Onamor
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The last 2 parts of the attached photo. (4 and 6 marks)
Im really not sure how to go about them in a (clever) way that won't take 2 hours.

Homework Equations


Possibly the fact that the product of the raising/lowering operators, J-J+ = J2x + J2y

Answers to previous question:
the matrix of J2 = 15/4 \hbar2 I4 (the identity)

and Jz is \hbar/2 times
[3 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0]
[0 0-1 0]
[0 0 0-3]

The Attempt at a Solution


For the explanation you could say that any operator represented in terms of its basis states is diagonal - but then how can you tell that those four given eigenvectors are the basis states of H? (you're only told that they are eigenvectors of Jz).

The eigenvalues are the enegry eigenvalues (along the diagonal), but to find the matrix (knowing its diagonal) you can just find <1|H|1>, <2|H|2>, <3|H|3> and <4|H|4>. But you need some sort of matrix or equation for the J2x + J2y part of the Hamiltonian - its possible to find their matrices in this basis but I just can't believe there isn't an easier way for 6 marks...

Thanks again to anyone who can help
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0098.jpg
    IMAG0098.jpg
    88.6 KB · Views: 481
Physics news on Phys.org
Onamor said:
For the explanation you could say that any operator represented in terms of its basis states is diagonal - but then how can you tell that those four given eigenvectors are the basis states of H? (you're only told that they are eigenvectors of Jz).

Did you compute [J^2,J_z] for part 2? What does it tell you about the eigenvectors for J^2 and J_z?

The eigenvalues are the enegry eigenvalues (along the diagonal), but to find the matrix (knowing its diagonal) you can just find <1|H|1>, <2|H|2>, <3|H|3> and <4|H|4>. But you need some sort of matrix or equation for the J2x + J2y part of the Hamiltonian - its possible to find their matrices in this basis but I just can't believe there isn't an easier way for 6 marks...

Can you write J_x^2 +J_y^2 in terms of J^2 and J_z?
 
Hi, thanks so much for your help!

fzero said:
Did you compute [J^2,J_z] for part 2? What does it tell you about the eigenvectors for J^2 and J_z?
Yes, their commutator is zero, so they commute and it is possible to find simultaneous eigenfunctions of both of them.

Can you write J_x^2 +J_y^2 in terms of J^2 and J_z?
I think J^2 - J_z^2 should do it?

Since (given your first tip) an eigenfunction of J_z is simultaneously an eigenfunction of J^2, would rewriting the Hamiltonian using this show that it is expressable in terms of the given four basis states? - and therefore is diagonal?

And then I guess to find the Hamiltonian's (diagonal) matrix elements you can now just use the previously calculated matrices for J^2 and J_z?

That would seems a lot more sensible than what I attempted...
 
Onamor said:
Since (given your first tip) an eigenfunction of J_z is simultaneously an eigenfunction of J^2, would rewriting the Hamiltonian using this show that it is expressable in terms of the given four basis states? - and therefore is diagonal?

And then I guess to find the Hamiltonian's (diagonal) matrix elements you can now just use the previously calculated matrices for J^2 and J_z?

That would seems a lot more sensible than what I attempted...

Yes, just compute a bit and you'll find that things are as you say. It's hard to get all of this straight just from lectures, so it's exercises like this that really teach you how things work.
 
Thanks again for your help. Yes, all maths needs practise, but QM is nearly unlearnable from books and lectures alone.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top