How high does a baton twirler throw a baton in 1.111111111111 seconds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweedeljoseph
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A baton twirler throws a baton upward, completing four revolutions while in the air, with an average angular speed of 1.80 revolutions per second. The time the baton spends in the air is calculated to be approximately 2.22 seconds, leading to a peak height reached in half that time, about 1.11 seconds. To find the maximum height, the baton can be treated as a particle that ascends and descends under gravity. The height can be determined using kinematic equations, focusing on the time of ascent. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly calculating the time and applying the appropriate physics equations to find the height.
sweedeljoseph

Homework Statement


A baton twirler throws a spinning baton directly upward. As it goes up and returns to the twirler's hand, the baton turns through four revolutions. Ignoring air resistance and assuming that the average angular speed of the baton is 1.80 rev/s, determine the height to which the center of the baton travels above the point of release.


Homework Equations


w=\theta/Delta t
*v=vo+at ~ w=wo+\omegat
*v2=vo2+2ax ~ w2=wo2+2\omega\theta
*x=vot+(1/2)at2 ~ \theta=wot+(1/2)at2

the ones with * means i changed it to what the problem is about. means the same thing just different letters so you won't get confused i guess.


The Attempt at a Solution


you find the height which is the same as distance but how would you plug that in? would the rev/s be the velocity part? its not in m/s are you supposed to convert it or something? i know it makes 4 revolutions but i still have no idea what to do just get the answer and multiply it by 4? please help!

thank you!
sweedel joseph
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if the baton goes through 4 revolutions in the air, and it makes 1.8 revolutions per second, then it should have stayed 4 rev /(1.8 rev/sec) = 2.22222222 seconds in the air.

So now I think you can consider the center of the baton as a particle which was shot straight up in the air and came back down in 2.2222222 seconds. So then you can find the maximum height of the particle.
 
wait how did you find time? just divide that by 60? then that answer divide it by the total you had.

since the answer is 2.222222 just plug that into the equation to find the distance? would it be the same does it matter if its height or length? just the negative stuff right but you don't need to worry about it because its going up.
 
I think the crux of the problem is in finding time... if you assume that the twirler holds it in the middle, spinning it, then throws it up and catches it in the same spot at the same height, then you shouldn't need to worry about how long it is or anything.

But think about it, if the baton will make 1.8 revolutions or spins every second, then 1.8 times the seconds should equal 4, since it made 4 revolutions. Solving for the seconds there i got 2.22222.

Then you could say that it went up in half the time, so that it came down in half the time, 1.1111111 seconds. Since it starts from rest at its highest point, consider it a particle that was dropped from rest and fell for 1.111111111111 seconds. The distance it fell should equal the distance from the maximum height to the twirler's hand, or what you are looking for.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top