Calculating Bending Result of Volumetric Strain in a Beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the resultant bending of a beam experiencing volumetric strain due to internal expansion and contraction. The strain distribution is derived from the deformation tensor, but additional information about the beam's constraints and the cause of the expansion is necessary for accurate analysis. Participants suggest treating the beam as two distinct parts for analytical purposes, with axial equilibrium and moment balance forming the basis of the calculations. A third equation is needed to solve the system, which depends on understanding the source of the volumetric changes. Clarifying these factors is essential for determining the bending moments and forces involved.
ScarTissue
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a problem involving the bending of a beam.

The bending is a result of an expansion within the beam, rather than an external load. Basically, there is an expansion in the volume of one side of the beam and a contraction on the other side. I have therefore calculated a volumetric strain distribution for a coss-section of the beam. What I need to know how to do, is calculate the resultant bending for that strain distribution. How would I go about this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi-
for volumetric strain distribution I suppose that you mean the trace of the deformation tensor. But in principle it is not enough to reconstruct the displacement field, and then the bending. What about beam constraints? Is this volume expansion/contraction due to temperature variations?

M
 
You haven't stated why there is an expansion on one side and a contraction on the other.

Whatever the reason, even if the beam is composed of a single material, for analytical purposes, it should be treated as though it were made of two different parts.

I have started you off with the attached sketch.

First we observe that at any section AA there is axial equilibrium. So the force in the tensile part is equal and opposite to the force in the compression part.

This pair of forces forms a couple which is balanced by bending moments developed within the material of each part. Each part develops a separate moment as shown.

So we get a second equation by summing these moments and equating them to this couple.

There are two equations and three unknowns (F, M1, M2) so we appeal to strain compatibility to supply a third equation. Then we can solve.

However to derive the third equation we need to know and factor in the effect of the source of the expansion.

So over to you
 

Attachments

  • bendy1.jpg
    bendy1.jpg
    8.8 KB · Views: 506
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Back
Top