Beginner question about special relativity

neginf
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Saw this in a book last night. I hope I read it right and am remembering it right.

If two rectangular coordinate systems share the same x-axis and one is moving at a constant speed towards positive x and a beam of light is traveling along their x axes going towards the positive, then at the beam is at x=ct and x'=ct', one for each system.

The book says then x-ct=M(x'-ct') for some constant M.
What I don't get is doesn't x-ct=0=x'-ct' mean M is 1?

What am I not understanding about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't add a variable to one side of an equation without adding it to both sides. A variable can end up being something other than one later on so that is why it is not done.
 
neginf said:
Saw this in a book last night. I hope I read it right and am remembering it right.

If two rectangular coordinate systems share the same x-axis and one is moving at a constant speed towards positive x and a beam of light is traveling along their x axes going towards the positive, then at the beam is at x=ct and x'=ct', one for each system.

The book says then x-ct=M(x'-ct') for some constant M.
What I don't get is doesn't x-ct=0=x'-ct' mean M is 1?

What am I not understanding about this?
Why do you limit the solution to M=1?

M can be any value and the equation is still true, isn't it?

0 = M(0) is true for any value of M, correct?
 
Thank you both. x-ct=x'-ct'=0 so x-ct=anything*(x'-ct').
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top