Beginning physics, in finding the electric field for a uniform line charg

AI Thread Summary
The total charge of the uniform line charge with a linear density of λ = 4.4 nC/m over a length of 5.0 m is calculated to be 22 nC. To find the electric field at various points along the x-axis, the standard formula E=kQ/[x^2] is initially applied, but it is noted that this formula is only valid for point charges, not extended objects. For accurate calculations, calculus must be employed to account for the contributions of infinitesimal charge segments along the rod. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct approach for extended charge distributions rather than relying on point charge equations. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving electric field problems involving uniform line charges.
krtica
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Q:
A uniform line charge that has a linear charge density λ = 4.4 nC/m is on the x-axis between x = 0 to x = 5.0 m.
(a) What is its total charge?

(b) Find the electric field on the x-axis at x = 6 m.

(c) Find the electric field on the x-axis at x = 11.0 m.

(d) Find the electric field on the x-axis at x = 240 m.


To solve for a, I used the equation Q=lambda*length. My answer is 22nC, which is correct.

To solve for the remaining portion of the question, I used E=kQ/[x^2], where I took x to be (L+a-x). L is defined as the length of the rod (5m), a is the difference between the given position and the rod (for b, 1m), and x is the distance from the origin to the midpoint of the rod (2.5m).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


krtica said:
To solve for the remaining portion of the question, I used E=kQ/[x^2], where I took x to be (L+a-x). L is defined as the length of the rod (5m), a is the difference between the given position and the rod (for b, 1m), and x is the distance from the origin to the midpoint of the rod (2.5m).

The fact that you didn't get the right answer proves that E=kQ/[x^2] can only be used for point masses, not for extended objects. (The sphere is an exception, but that's a special case.) To solve this problem, you have to use calculus. What's the charge contributed by a length "dx" of rod a distance "x" from the given position?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top