Bernoulli River: Calculating Water Speed

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed of water in the Bernoulli River, the equation of continuity is applied, stating that the flow into the river junction equals the flow out. The total flow rate is the sum of the flow rates from Rivers Pascal and Archimedes, which is 1.52×10^6 L/s. The cross-sectional area of the Bernoulli River is calculated as 3,800 m² (190 m wide and 20 m deep). By using the formula Q = A × v, the speed of the water can be determined by rearranging the equation to v = Q/A. It is essential to include units in calculations to ensure accuracy and clarity in the results.
Dilman Sidhu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

: River Pascal with a volume flow rate of 4.8×105L/s joins with River Archimedes, which carries 1.04×106L/s , to form the Bernoulli River. The Bernoulli River is 190 m wide and 20 m deep.[/B]

Homework Equations

:
What is the speed of the water in the Bernoulli River?
Express your answer using two significant figures.
Express answer in m/s.[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I have not yet attempted to write any answers b/c I'm unsure how to solve the equation. I believe I have to use Bernoulli's equation since that is a recent topic in class.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Dilman, :welcome:

Good of you to mention there is a b and a c part in this exercise. Maybe the a part is just a warming up ?
And you can safely assume the B river carries off the sum of the flows so there is no unpleasant accumulation at the confluence...
 
  • Like
Likes Dilman Sidhu
Thanks! I understood the speed of River B would have to include the values given for Rivers 1 and 2. I got an answer of 0.4 m/s which was correct but I was wondering if you could better explain the logic behind why the summation of the given values for Rivers 1 and 2 was divided by 3800 (190 m/s x 20 m/s = 3800).
 
I don't know what you are referring to, but I can easily guess that the division was not by 190 m/s x 20 m/s = 3800 m2/s2 !
Always, always check your dimensions !

Write out the detailed steps of the calculation -- with the dimensions and see that it all fits nicely. Post if you want comments.
 
Dilman Sidhu said:
Thanks! I understood the speed of River B would have to include the values given for Rivers 1 and 2. I got an answer of 0.4 m/s which was correct but I was wondering if you could better explain the logic behind why the summation of the given values for Rivers 1 and 2 was divided by 3800 (190 m/s x 20 m/s = 3800).
This is an application of the equation of continuity, not so much an application of the Bernoulli equation.

Here, the equation of continuity is "amount of water flowing into the river junction = the amount of water flowing out of the river junction"

In terms of algebra, Qin = Qout
and
Q = A ⋅ v, where
Q - flow in m3 / s
A - cross sectional area of the channel(s), m2
v - velocity of the flow, m/s

The area of the channel of River Bernoulli is A = 190 m × 20 m = 3800 m2

Units are included in calculations to help you make sense of the numbers. They are not intended to be a nuisance.
 
It is best practise to do the algebra on the symbols, substituting the numbers at the end.
The volume rate of flow Q is given by ##Q=vA## where A is the crossection area of the pipe (in this case the river) and v (perpendicular) is the speed of the flow.
You've already worked out that the flow rate for the Bournoulli river must be the sum of the flows for the other two so ##Q = Q_A+Q_P## ... if v is to be the speed of the Bournoulli river, then A must be its crossection - roughly width times depth: ##A=WD## (you could choose a different approximation for the shape of the river if you like.)

Now all the variables in the definition are in terms of stuff you know, you can substitute and use algebra to solve the resulting equation for v, using symbols only.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top