Best time interval for measuring capacitor discharge?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring capacitor discharge using the equation V = Vo e-t/RC, specifically aiming for the voltage to halve in 15 seconds. The participant initially chose to record voltage every 10 seconds to avoid inaccuracies associated with shorter intervals. Suggestions from others included using a digital oscilloscope and repeating the experiment three times with varying start times to gather more data points. This approach would allow for capturing voltage at multiple intervals, enhancing the accuracy of the results. The participant expressed appreciation for the suggestions and plans to implement them in their experiment.
accountdracula
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My (practise) coursework is to test the equation 'V = Vo e-t/RC' and choose values of R and C so that the voltage across the capacitor falls to half in 15 seconds. I decided it would be too difficult and inaccurate to record the voltage across the capacitor every 5 seconds, so I chose 10. However, I'm not sure if this will get me enough readings.

Homework Equations


V = Vo e-t/RC

The Attempt at a Solution


I decided it would be too difficult and inaccurate to record the voltage across the capacitor every 5 seconds, plus having a small time interval would give a larger percentage error, so I chose 10. However, I'm not sure if this will get me enough readings if the voltage is going to halve in 15 seconds. However, I know the rate of discharge will decrease, so it may be suitable anyway. Does anyone have any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suggestion 1: Use a digital oscilloscope.
Suggestion 2: Repeat the experiment three times. In each case, wait for the voltage to dip below some voltage - say 5.00 - before starting the timer. Then catch the voltage at 5 seconds, 20 seconds, 35 seconds, and 50 seconds on the first try. Then at 10 seconds, 25 seconds, 40 seconds, and 55 seconds on the seconds try. Then 15 seconds, 30 seconds, 46 seconds, and 60 seconds on the third try. That will give you zero to 60 seconds in 5 second intervals and 15 seconds to make each recording.
 
  • Like
Likes accountdracula
.Scott said:
Suggestion 1: Use a digital oscilloscope.
Suggestion 2: Repeat the experiment three times. In each case, wait for the voltage to dip below some voltage - say 5.00 - before starting the timer. Then catch the voltage at 5 seconds, 20 seconds, 35 seconds, and 50 seconds on the first try. Then at 10 seconds, 25 seconds, 40 seconds, and 55 seconds on the seconds try. Then 15 seconds, 30 seconds, 46 seconds, and 60 seconds on the third try. That will give you zero to 60 seconds in 5 second intervals and 15 seconds to make each recording.

That's a really clever idea, thank you! I'll definitely try that tomorrow.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top