Best way to integrate a moment generating function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around integrating a moment generating function represented by the integral ∫etxx2e-x. Participants are exploring methods for integration, particularly focusing on integration by parts and potential shortcuts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenges of integrating the function using integration by parts, with some suggesting the possibility of shortcuts like the quotient rule. Others mention the need for practice with multiple integrations by parts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning the effectiveness of different integration methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of integration by parts, but no consensus has been reached on a simpler approach.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific results related to the mean and variance, which are consistent with known values, but the exact integration process remains under discussion. Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their results.

trojansc82
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



∫etxx2e-x

Homework Equations



M(t) = etx f(x) dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the solution is -1/(t-3)3, however I'm having difficulty integrating the function. UV - ∫ V DU is extremely long and challenging, I'm wondering if there is a shortcut (i.e. quotient rule?)

Also, there is a process used here but I'm unable to understand it:

Untitled-1.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trojansc82 said:

Homework Statement



∫etxx2e-x

Homework Equations



M(t) = etx f(x) dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the solution is -1/(t-3)3, however I'm having difficulty integrating the function. UV - ∫ V DU is extremely long and challenging, I'm wondering if there is a shortcut (i.e. quotient rule?)

Unfortunately, integration by parts is the antiderivative method generated by the product or quotient rules. I don't know of any shortcut. Let u = x2 the first round than u = x the second round and you should be able to integrate the result directly.
 
It looks like that example integrated by parts multiple times. It is easy if you practice. Another method could be differentiation by the parameter.
Let In(t) be integrals like yours where n is the power of x

Then notice
In(t)=DnI0(t)=Dn(-1/(t-1))

where
D is differentiation with respect to t
I0(t)=(-1/(t-1))
 
LCKurtz said:
Unfortunately, integration by parts is the antiderivative method generated by the product or quotient rules. I don't know of any shortcut. Let u = x2 the first round than u = x the second round and you should be able to integrate the result directly.

I did the integration by parts, and I ended up with 1/(1-t)3...is that incorrect?

The mean and variance were still the same as the book's answers (μ = 3, σ2 = 3)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K