BJT Transition Frequency for a High-Frequency Design

AI Thread Summary
Transition frequency, or unity-gain bandwidth, is crucial for high-frequency BJT designs, particularly for signals around 120-125 MHz. To achieve a current gain of 10 at 125 MHz, a BJT with a transition frequency of approximately 1.25 GHz is recommended, as lower transition frequencies will result in insufficient gain. Factors such as input and Miller capacitance significantly impact the effective gain and performance at high frequencies, making it essential to consider these characteristics when selecting a BJT. Additionally, the input impedance at high frequencies can complicate driving requirements, emphasizing the importance of power gain over voltage gain in RF applications. Understanding these parameters is vital for successful high-frequency BJT amplifier design.
satchmo05
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

If I understand correctly, transition frequency is synonymous with the unity-gain bandwidth frequency. With that said, if you divide the gain at the operating frequency by the transition frequency, you should get the operating frequency. Please correct my logic if I am incorrect.

The reason why I ask is because I am designing a system that uses HF signals (120 & 125 MHz), and I am in need of a BJT that can handle these sorts of HF signals. At this frequency, I need a current gain, hFE/β somewhere between 5-40 (not exactly sure incoming base current at this time). I'm assuming the gain would need to be somewhere around 5-10.

Due to its availability and cost ($0.00), I have researched the 2N2222A NPN BJT. It has a transition frequency of 300 MHz. With my logic above, if I were to operate at 125 MHz, I would receive a current gain close to 2.5, well under what I need for my design. Is my logic correct here? Do I need to look for a BJT with a transition frequency closer to 1 GHz to obtain the required current gain I need?

Thank you for your assistance,

- Satchmo05

P.S. I apologize for posting this twice, I realized it would be better for me to post this in the EE section, rather than General Engineering Design.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't have the sure answer, I just join in the discussion.

Rough estimate, if you want gain of 10 at 125MHz, you want f_T\;=1.25GHz which is 10 time 125MHz. I have designed BJT amplifier circuits with comparable gain faster than 125MHz using 1GHz BJTs

But in reality, I don't think it is nothing that simple. I think the f_T\; is defined in certain input driving condition. There are other factors in the input driving characteristics that are very important. Don't quote me on this, but... It has a lot to do with input capacitance and Miller capacitance: C_{be} \;\hbox {and } C_{bc}\; respectively. If your drive is 50Ω, you form an RC and there is a pole that relates to f_T\;. But if your drive is very low impedance, it would be faster.

Another factor is the transit time or something in the semi conductor which I am not familiar with, also play a role in the speed of the BJT.

I know the s-parameter of RF BJT take into consideration of the input capacitance and Miller capacitance, that the reason you have S_{11} \;\hbox { and } S_{12}. That's the reason you see from Smith Chart the input impedance actually become reactive and goes quite low.

When you talk about gain, I assume is voltage gain. But if frequency is very high, the input impedance become quite low and driving become a problem. In RF, we mostly talk about power gain rather than voltage gain as it take power to drive the BJT to get output. In another word even if you have a voltage gain equal 10, but if your input impedance become so low that it takes a lot of power to even drive the input.

Someone more familiar with BJT might be able to answer this.
 
Last edited:
I surf around a little. f_T\; is defined as frequency where \beta\; falls to unity. It is the frequency current gain drops to unity.

In another word, R_{in}= \beta R_E≈R_E\; The input impedance beome low and the transistor kind of disappeared!

Here is a link:

http://cktse.eie.polyu.edu.hk/eie304/FrequencyResponse.pdf
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top