Blackbody radiation of beam of light

bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a 100W beam of light is shone onto a blackbody of mass 2e-3 kg for 10e4 seconds. The blackbody is intially at rest in a frictionless space

a) Compute the total energy and momentum absorbed by the blackbody from the light beam b) calculate the blackbody's velocity at the end of the period of illumination, and c) compute the final kinetic energy of the blackbody. Why is the latter less than the total energy of the absorbed photons?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a) find energy - easy 100 J/s * 10e5 s =1e6 J absorbed

momentum - here's the part I'm slightly unsure of. At first I thought that I needed the wavelength, but that's only if I want to know the momentum of an individual photon.

So here's what I said sum of photon momentum = 1/c * sum of absorbed energy
so sum of absorbed p = 0.0033 kgm/s

b) 0.0033 = (2e-3)*v , v =1.65 m/s

c) (1/2)*(2e-3)*1.65^2 = 0.0027 J and I think this is less than the total energy of the absorbed photons because much of the energy goes into raising the temperature of the blackbody and much of the energy is radiated out.

Is this correct? I'm not sure if I have a really good picture of what is going on in my head.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any thoughts on this one?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top