Block on Ramp HW: Normal Force & Static Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter 012983
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Ramp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics homework problem involving a block on a ramp, specifically calculating the normal force and static friction. The user has correctly identified the x- and y-components of weight as mg sin(theta) and mg cos(theta), respectively, and confirmed that the normal force is mg cos(theta). However, they were advised to consider the sum of forces in the x-direction to derive the acceleration and the coefficient of static friction. The conversation also addresses confusion regarding the calculation of net force, emphasizing that small or negative values may arise from rounding errors or directional assumptions. Clarifications on how to find the coefficient of friction and the conditions for sliding were provided to aid understanding.
012983
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I did one of the standard block-on-a-ramp labs last week. It involved placing a pre-defined mass on a plank of wood and raising the plank until the mass started to slide down. I recorded theta and rolled from there.

I'm kind of looking for a confirmation of my work thus far and a little help on how to go on. I have the mass down to the x- and y-components and have to determine the normal force, and from there, force and the coefficient of static friction.

The table I'm using is attached.


Homework Equations


F = ma
F(s) = U(s)*N

The Attempt at a Solution



I used mgcos(theta) for the y-component and mgsin(theta) for the x-component of the weight.

I'm thinking the normal force is mgcos(theta).

I assume I use F=mgsin(theta)=ma to solve for the next column in the table. Do I get a from a = gsin(theta) (acceleration along the incline)?

I understand how to get the static force in the last column. Thanks for any help.
 

Attachments

  • garbage1.jpg
    garbage1.jpg
    5 KB · Views: 560
Physics news on Phys.org
You've calculated the x and y components of the weight correctly; mg_x=mg sin(theta) and mg_y=mg cos(theta).
The normal force is also correct; F_n=mg cos (theta).
However, you've forgotten that ma is equal to the sum of all forces in a system. Therefore (you must take the forces in the x direction only, since the forces in the y direction simply sum to zero):
Sum of forces_x= ma
mg_x-F_fr=ma
The equation for friction force, where u is the coefficient of friction, is u*F_n. In this case:
mg_x-u*F_n=ma
mg sin(theta)-u*mg cos (theta)=ma
Cancel the masses, factor out the g:
a= g*[sin (theta) - u cos (theta)].
Hope this helps!
 
amy andrews said:
You've calculated the x and y components of the weight correctly; mg_x=mg sin(theta) and mg_y=mg cos(theta).
The normal force is also correct; F_n=mg cos (theta).
However, you've forgotten that ma is equal to the sum of all forces in a system. Therefore (you must take the forces in the x direction only, since the forces in the y direction simply sum to zero):
Sum of forces_x= ma
mg_x-F_fr=ma
The equation for friction force, where u is the coefficient of friction, is u*F_n. In this case:
mg_x-u*F_n=ma
mg sin(theta)-u*mg cos (theta)=ma
Cancel the masses, factor out the g:
a= g*[sin (theta) - u cos (theta)].
Hope this helps!

I thought of using that equation, but I didn't have a value for u to plug in... I assumed we were supposed to find a another way and use it to find u.

Now I'm confused even more, heh. Thanks for the response, though!
 
You can find u from
mg_x>F_fr, since the block will only start sliding when the x component of the weight is greater than the force friction.
Does that help at all?
 
amy andrews said:
You can find u from
mg_x>F_fr, since the block will only start sliding when the x component of the weight is greater than the force friction.
Does that help at all?

I recalculated the values for u and got the exact same values as I did using a = gsin(theta). However, when I recalculate the net force I get very small results (e.g., 0.0000847 N) and in one case a negative net force. Is this right?

Thanks.
 
I'm not completely sure what you mean by "net force". In the y direction, however, the forces should sum to zero, as the force normal cancels out the y component of the weight. Your extremely small force should possibly be simply zero- perhaps you rounded off too soon when calculating the forces?
For the negative force- remember that positive and negative forces simply depend on direction. I'm assuming you're taking "down the ramp" as negative and "up the ramp" as positive. In that case, when the x component of the weight becomes larger than the force friction, the net force will indeed be negative.
I'm not sure if this was what you were looking for...let me know!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top