Analyzing a Pulley System: Solving for Energy and Work

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a pulley system problem involving energy and work calculations for two blocks. Key equations used include the work-energy principle, kinetic energy (KE), and potential energy (PE). A significant error identified is the incorrect mass used for Block A in the potential energy equation, which should be 50 kg instead of 100 kg. Participants suggest using force balances as an alternative method to verify the energy calculations and highlight the importance of correctly accounting for friction's impact on kinetic energy. The conversation emphasizes the need for accuracy in both mass values and the signs of forces in the calculations.
minimario
Messages
95
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


AjbiTtv.png


Homework Equations


## W_{nc} = \Delta KE + \Delta PE ##
## PE = mgh ##
## KE = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 ##

The Attempt at a Solution


For Block B, ## \Delta KE + \Delta PE = \frac{1}{2} 100 v^2 + (-20)(g)(100) ##

For Block A, ## \Delta KE + \Delta PE = \frac{1}{2} 50 v^2 + (20 \sin 37^{\circ})(g)(100) ##

Therefore, we have the total change in energy is ## 75 v^2 - 13702 ##. This is the total work done by nonconservative forces.

The only nonconservative force is friction on the A block. The normal force on the A block is ## 50g \cos 37^{\circ} ##, so the friction force is ## (0.25)(50g \cos 37^{\circ}) ## The work done by friction is then ## - 20 \cdot (0.25)(50g \cos 37^{\circ}) = 1956.66 ##, so ## 75v^2-13702 = 1956.66 \Rightarrow v^2 = 208.77 ##, so the Kinetic Energy change is ## \frac{1}{2} (50)(208.77) = 5219.25 ##

This is incorrect, can anyone find what's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, for one thing, in the PE of A, the mass is 50 kg, not 100 kg. Is this a typo, or did you really use 100?

Chet
 
I suggest a simpler approach: determine the net force; from that and from the masses involved, find the acceleration, and you have solved a half of the problem...
 
Chestermiller said:
Well, for one thing, in the PE of A, the mass is 50 kg, not 100 kg. Is this a typo, or did you really use 100?

Chet
That was a typo.
 
There should be a sin 37 in the potential energy term of block B also.

Chet
 
Then the P.E.s of A and B cancel out?

That doesn't give the right ans either... (do you get v^2 = 52.1776)
 
minimario said:
Then the P.E.s of A and B cancel out?

That doesn't give the right ans either... (do you get v^2 = 52.1776)
No, they don't cancel out. Don't forget your typo on the masses.

Chet
 
So now v^2 = 104.73, is that right?
 
minimario said:
So now v^2 = 104.73, is that right?
Shouldn't the friction decrease the kinetic energy?

Chet
 
  • #10
Yes, but the 100 kg block provides the energy and accelerates it.
 
  • #11
minimario said:
Yes, but the 100 kg block provides the energy and accelerates it.
If there were no friction, the velocity of the blocks would be higher.

Chet
 
  • #12
What do you mean? The 100 kg provides a force to counteract the friction...
 
  • #13
minimario said:
What do you mean? The 100 kg provides a force to counteract the friction...
What I mean is that you have the wrong sign on the friction term.

One way to be sure is to solve the problem using force balances rather than the energy balance. At the very least, you should check to see that they both give the same answer.

Chet
 
Back
Top