Body trajectory and force direction

AI Thread Summary
When a particle moves in a specific direction at a constant speed and a force is later applied at an angle, the particle will not align its motion with the force direction if the force only affects one component of motion. In projectile motion, gravity acts downward, modifying only the vertical component of velocity, while the horizontal component remains unchanged. Over time, the vertical velocity can grow significantly, making the overall velocity vector approach a vertical direction but never fully align with the gravitational force. If the force affects both components of motion, the particle will not point along the force direction. Thus, the general concept indicates that a force can influence the trajectory but may not result in alignment with its direction.
foggy37
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Forum,

Let's consider a particle that is giving an initial speed in a certain direction. The particle is now moving in that initial direction at a constant speed.
If a later moment a force starts acting on the particle and the force direction is not along the original particle direction of motion, will that applied force eventually pull the particle in such a way that the particle travels along the force direction?

If I think of projectile motion with the object launched at a certain angle to the horizontal direction, the particle will trace an inverted parabolic path. The force of gravity is always pointing straight down and the particle direction (velocity vector direction) never ends up pointing exactly along the vertical direction...Would it if enough time was allowed to pass and the vertical distance was large enough?

Another situation: centripetal force. No matter what, if the force is perpendicular to the particle direction, the particle will change direction but will never end up pointing along the force direction...

what is the general concept?

thanks,
foggy37
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, a vertical force will never slow a horizontal component of the motion. Why should it?
 
Thanks dauto.

As far as the projectile motion, the force of gravity is straight down vertical while the initial motion has both a vertical and a horizontal component. As you mention, the force will only modify the y-component of the velocity vector and not the x-component.

Surely the y-component v_y of the velocity vector grows and grows until it becomes so much larger than the horizontal component v_x as the projectile is moving downward. That means that the velocity vector (direction of motion) will never point exactly along the direction of the vertical gravity force but will get very close to it if enough time goes by, i..e the velocity vector will become almost vertical too.

In general, we can say that if applied force is in a constant direction and it affects only one component of motion, the motion will eventually move very close to the force direction.

If the force affects both components of motion (both v_x and v_y) the object will never end up pointing along the force direction...thanks
foggy37
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top