Bohr Hypothesis: Proving Orbital Radius is Quantized

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason Gomez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bohr
Jason Gomez
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question:
If we assume that an electron is bound to the nucleus (assume a H atom) in a circular orbit, then the Coulomb force is equal to the centripetal force:
mv^2/r= ke^2/r^2
In the Bohr hypothesis, angular momentum, L = mvr is quantized as integer multiples of (h-bar): L = n(h-bar). Show that if this is true, orbital radius is also quantized: r = n^2aB.
aB = (hbar)^2/(ke^2m(electron))


Homework Equations



I have to be honest, I am completely lost. The book doesn't go in any detail and nor did the professor so I am stuck. If I could just get a helpfull hint or advice it would be greatly appreciated

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{mv^2}{r} = \frac{ke^2}{r^2} \implies r = \frac{ke^2}{mv^2}

L = mvr = nh \implies r = \frac{nh}{mv}

If you combine these expressions and solve for the quantity (mv), you can then plug this back into solve for r:

\frac{ke^2}{mv^2} = \frac{nh}{mv}
 
Oh, let me work with that a little, I will be back on later, thank you
 
I forgot to come back because I have been busy, but thank you, that did help I figured it out.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top