Bohr-Sommerfeld Rule: Solving for the Quantized Values of E, r, and ω

  • Thread starter Thread starter knowLittle
  • Start date Start date
knowLittle
Messages
307
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Imagine that force for is atom was ## F= - \frac{\beta}{r^4}##, rather than ##F=- \frac{ke^2}{r^2}##, and consider only circular orbits, it would remain true that ##L_n= n \hbar##

a.) From Netwon's law find the relationship between ##T ##(Kinetic Energy) and ##V##,
b.) Find ##E## as a function of ##r##
c.) Find quantized values of ##r_n##
d.) "" quantized values of ##\omega_n##
e.) "" quantized values of ##E_n##
f.) Does it remain true that for high ##n, \Delta E= E_{n+1}- E_n \approx \hbar \omega_n ##

Note: The definition of ##\beta## is not given. It bothers me. They are not saying that from both F's given we could solve for ##\beta##, how do I overcome this ambiguity.

The Attempt at a Solution


a.)[/B] Comparing force in a spring
## F_{net}=F_{spring} =-kx= ma##
The description of SHM is closely related to uniform circular motion.
##E= K_E +V##

##E=\frac{1 m v^2}{2} + \frac{kx^2}{2}##

Is this correct?

b.)
##E =K_E + V ##
We are given ## F=- \frac{\beta}{r^4}##
We know that centripetal force ##F_c= \frac{mv^2}{r} ##
## r F = mv^2##
According to the problem this F and the F involving ##\beta## are equivalent.
So, ##mv^2= r \frac{\beta}{r^4} = \frac{\beta}{r^3}##
Then, ##K_E = \frac{\beta}{2r^3}##

Now, note that ##V=- \int F dr##
## V= + \int \frac{\beta}{r^4} dr= \beta \frac{1}{-3 r^3}##

Finally, ## E= \frac{\beta}{2r^3} - \frac{\beta}{3r^3}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
knowLittle said:
Note: The definition of ##\beta## is not given. It bothers me. They are not saying that from both F's given we could solve for ##\beta##, how do I overcome this ambiguity.
The numerical value of ##\beta## is not important to solve the problem, just like the numerical values of ##k## and ##e## wouldn't be needed in the case with the Coulomb interaction.

knowLittle said:
a.) Comparing force in a spring
## F_{net}=F_{spring} =-kx= ma##
The description of SHM is closely related to uniform circular motion.
##E= K_E +V##

##E=\frac{1 m v^2}{2} + \frac{kx^2}{2}##

Is this correct?
This is not relevant to the problem, which has nothing to do with harmonic motion. Part of the solution for a) you actually have answered in b).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top