Boiling Point of Nitrogen References

AI Thread Summary
The boiling point of liquid nitrogen is 77.36K, and while it is common to use this value in scientific reports, referencing a reliable source is advisable. The CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics is recommended as a credible source for this data, having been published annually for over a century. The boiling point is determined experimentally, though variations can occur due to atmospheric pressure and impurities. It is important to note that while the value is widely accepted, it is based on experimental measurements rather than a single definitive study. Access to the CRC handbook is available through university subscriptions, providing a reliable reference for scientific reporting.
Seannation
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm writing up a report on an experiment I did involving liquid nitrogen.

I need to state the boiling point of liquid nitrogen (77.36K) in the report, as I've used it in calculations, but I don't know if I should get a reference for it or not. I did use a reference (Wikipedia and Google searches) to find the 77.36K value, but I don't know whether it is common to assume that a physical property of a substance like its boiling temperature is correct in scientific reports without citing a source.

And, if I do need to reference a source for the boiling point, does anyone know of a good source to use? Would I find this value in a journal somewhere?

Also, is there an error on 77.36K? An error on this temperature would be helpful to propagate through to my final results' errors.

Finally, I'd like to know how the value of 77.36K was established. Was it one study that conclusively found this value to be 77.36K, a general consensus amongst professionals, or is it defined as that value (in the way that 100 degrees Celsius is defined as the temperature of the boiling point of water at sea level)?

Help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good source of this is hte CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, great for all sorts of data (and for stunning small animals)
It's been published every year for a century so you can often pick up a few year old copy for very little in library sales - and the boiling point of LN2 hasn't changed much!

The boiling point is established experimentally, you simply boil some with a thermometer in it. There is single definitive boiling point (assuming a single isotope) but in a real experiment there will be a variation due to atmospheric pressure and impurities.
 
Last edited:
Cheers for that.

My university is an Athens subscriber so I can access the online version of that CRC handbook.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top