Books on Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on recommendations for textbooks that explore various interpretations of quantum mechanics, specifically avoiding popular science books. Key texts mentioned include Steven Weinberg's "Lectures on Quantum Mechanics," Franck Laloë's "Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics," and Gerard 't Hooft's "The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics," which presents a deterministic view and addresses the measurement problem. The conversation highlights the significance of the Measurement Problem in quantum interpretations, with John Bell's "Against Measurement" noted for its engaging treatment of the topic. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for deeper understanding beyond classical interpretations to address the complexities of quantum mechanics.
noir1993
Messages
33
Reaction score
16
What are some good textbooks dealing with various Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics? I am not asking for popular science books. I have a book called 'Understanding Quantum Mechanics' by Ronald Omens on the consistent histories approach and I am looking for something like that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Copenhagen-style shut-up-and-calculate interpretation which works is, or should be :), loved by everyone. Nonetheless it has the "Measurement Problem", which is the main question interpretations aim to solve. A great and entertaining discussion of the problem is John Bell's "Against Measurement" http://www.tau.ac.il/~quantum/Vaidman/IQM/BellAM.pdf.

Steven Weinberg's "Lectures on Quantum Mechanics" has a very good section on interpretation https://www.amazon.com/Lectures-Quantum-Mechanics-Steven-Weinberg/dp/1107028728.

Franck Laloë's "Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics" is also excellent https://www.amazon.com/dp/110702501X/?tag=pfamazon01-20. An earlier article by Laloë with the same title is available at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0209123.

I remain skeptical about the details, but I would really like the Deutsch-Wallace version of Many-Worlds to work because it is so intriguing. David Wallace describes the approach in "The Emergent Multiverse". https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199546967/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This one French physicist Bernard D'Espagnat wrote an interesting book which covers a lot of this material in depth called On Physics and Philosophy. In it he's putting forth his own interpretation, so he does confront and criticize all the other popular interpretations, but he still presents an in depth description of each one, and discusses their individual strengths and weaknesses.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
I recently came across a book by Gerard 't Hooft. If anyone can provide a feedback, I'd be really grateful.
And you can even access it for free at http://www.springer.com/in/book/9783319412849

The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Authors: 't Hooft, Gerard

  • A radically different approach to the challenges of quantum theory
  • Authored by one of today's most creative theoretical physicists
  • Pedagogically structured to first introduce concepts and main arguments, with technical details presented separately
This book presents the deterministic view of quantum mechanics developed by Nobel Laureate Gerard 't Hooft.

Dissatisfied with the uncomfortable gaps in the way conventional quantum mechanics meshes with the classical world, 't Hooft has revived the old hidden variable ideas, but now in a much more systematic way than usual. In this, quantum mechanics is viewed as a tool rather than a theory.

The author gives examples of models that are classical in essence, but can be analysed by the use of quantum techniques, and argues that even the Standard Model, together with gravitational interactions, might be viewed as a quantum mechanical approach to analysing a system that could be classical at its core. He shows how this approach, even though it is based on hidden variables, can be plausibly reconciled with Bell's theorem, and how the usual objections voiced against the idea of ‘superdeterminism' can be overcome, at least in principle.
This framework elegantly explains - and automatically cures - the problems of the wave function collapse and the measurement problem. Even the existence of an “arrow of time" can perhaps be explained in a more elegant way than usual. As well as reviewing the author’s earlier work in the field, the book also contains many new observations and calculations. It provides stimulating reading for all physicists working on the foundations of quantum theory.
 
Another vote for Laloe!
If you want to take only one book, let it be this one.
 
  • Like
Likes noir1993
In principle, there would be no need for various interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. The problem is that many physicists still insist on thinking about quantum phenomena within the scope of classical ideas and notions.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and dextercioby
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top