Books on Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around recommendations for textbooks that address various interpretations of quantum mechanics. Participants seek academic resources rather than popular science books, exploring different theoretical perspectives and critiques within the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests recommendations for textbooks similar to 'Understanding Quantum Mechanics' by Ronald Omens, specifically focused on interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  • Another participant discusses the Copenhagen interpretation, mentioning its "Measurement Problem" and recommending John Bell's "Against Measurement" as well as Steven Weinberg's "Lectures on Quantum Mechanics" and Franck Laloë's "Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics."
  • A third participant highlights Bernard D'Espagnat's "On Physics and Philosophy," noting its in-depth coverage of various interpretations and their strengths and weaknesses.
  • One participant mentions Gerard 't Hooft's book on the Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, describing it as a deterministic view that revives hidden variable ideas and addresses issues like wave function collapse and the measurement problem.
  • Another participant expresses strong support for Laloë's work, suggesting it as a primary recommendation.
  • One participant posits that the existence of multiple interpretations may stem from physicists' reliance on classical concepts when considering quantum phenomena.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the interpretations of quantum mechanics, with no consensus on a single preferred approach or interpretation. Various viewpoints and recommendations coexist without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference specific interpretations and their critiques, but the limitations of each interpretation and the assumptions underlying them are not fully explored. The conversation reflects ongoing debates within the field.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and researchers in physics, particularly those focused on the foundations of quantum mechanics and the philosophical implications of different interpretations.

noir1993
Messages
33
Reaction score
16
What are some good textbooks dealing with various Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics? I am not asking for popular science books. I have a book called 'Understanding Quantum Mechanics' by Ronald Omens on the consistent histories approach and I am looking for something like that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Copenhagen-style shut-up-and-calculate interpretation which works is, or should be :), loved by everyone. Nonetheless it has the "Measurement Problem", which is the main question interpretations aim to solve. A great and entertaining discussion of the problem is John Bell's "Against Measurement" http://www.tau.ac.il/~quantum/Vaidman/IQM/BellAM.pdf.

Steven Weinberg's "Lectures on Quantum Mechanics" has a very good section on interpretation https://www.amazon.com/Lectures-Quantum-Mechanics-Steven-Weinberg/dp/1107028728.

Franck Laloë's "Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics" is also excellent https://www.amazon.com/dp/110702501X/?tag=pfamazon01-20. An earlier article by Laloë with the same title is available at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0209123.

I remain skeptical about the details, but I would really like the Deutsch-Wallace version of Many-Worlds to work because it is so intriguing. David Wallace describes the approach in "The Emergent Multiverse". https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199546967/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This one French physicist Bernard D'Espagnat wrote an interesting book which covers a lot of this material in depth called On Physics and Philosophy. In it he's putting forth his own interpretation, so he does confront and criticize all the other popular interpretations, but he still presents an in depth description of each one, and discusses their individual strengths and weaknesses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
I recently came across a book by Gerard 't Hooft. If anyone can provide a feedback, I'd be really grateful.
And you can even access it for free at http://www.springer.com/in/book/9783319412849

The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Authors: 't Hooft, Gerard

  • A radically different approach to the challenges of quantum theory
  • Authored by one of today's most creative theoretical physicists
  • Pedagogically structured to first introduce concepts and main arguments, with technical details presented separately
This book presents the deterministic view of quantum mechanics developed by Nobel Laureate Gerard 't Hooft.

Dissatisfied with the uncomfortable gaps in the way conventional quantum mechanics meshes with the classical world, 't Hooft has revived the old hidden variable ideas, but now in a much more systematic way than usual. In this, quantum mechanics is viewed as a tool rather than a theory.

The author gives examples of models that are classical in essence, but can be analysed by the use of quantum techniques, and argues that even the Standard Model, together with gravitational interactions, might be viewed as a quantum mechanical approach to analysing a system that could be classical at its core. He shows how this approach, even though it is based on hidden variables, can be plausibly reconciled with Bell's theorem, and how the usual objections voiced against the idea of ‘superdeterminism' can be overcome, at least in principle.
This framework elegantly explains - and automatically cures - the problems of the wave function collapse and the measurement problem. Even the existence of an “arrow of time" can perhaps be explained in a more elegant way than usual. As well as reviewing the author’s earlier work in the field, the book also contains many new observations and calculations. It provides stimulating reading for all physicists working on the foundations of quantum theory.
 
Another vote for Laloe!
If you want to take only one book, let it be this one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: noir1993
In principle, there would be no need for various interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. The problem is that many physicists still insist on thinking about quantum phenomena within the scope of classical ideas and notions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K