Bose condensation in a harmonic potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the total number of quantum states for a gas of weakly interacting bosons trapped in a 3D harmonic potential. Participants are exploring the relationship between energy levels and quantum states, particularly focusing on the density of states as a function of energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the geometric interpretation of quantum states in n-space and the volume of a tetrahedron formed by the intersection of planes. There is an attempt to relate the volume to the density of states through integration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on expressing the volume in terms of a constant derived from energy equations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to simplify expressions and the implications of assuming large energy values.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of relating variables in the context of the problem, particularly the assumptions about the size of energy relative to other constants in the equations.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87

Homework Statement


[/B]
Consider a gas of N weakly interacting bosons trapped in a 3d harmonic potential ##V = \frac{1}{2}mw^2 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)##. The single particle quantum states have energies ##\epsilon = \hbar w (n_x + n_y + n_z + 3/2)##.

Calculate the total number of quantum states with energies less than ##\epsilon## and from this deduce that the density of states ##g(\epsilon)## is $$g(\epsilon) \approx \frac{\epsilon^2}{2 (\hbar w)^3} \,\,\,\text{for large}\,\,\,\,\epsilon$$
Hint: ##\epsilon## is a function of ##\mathbf n## rather than just the magnitude ##n##. A surface of constant energy is a plane in ##n## space and the number of states with energy less than ##\epsilon## is given by the volume of a tetrahedron.

Homework Equations


[/B]
##V = \int_0^{\epsilon_{max}} g(\epsilon) d \epsilon##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
A plane intersecting the ##n_x, n_y ## and ##n_z## axes form a tetrahedron with the sides the ##n_x - n_y## plane, ##n_y - n_z## plane and so on. The volume of such a tetrahedron is ##V = n_x n_y n_z/6##. Therefore per the hint, $$\frac{n_x n_y n_z}{6} = \int_0^{\epsilon_{max}} g(\epsilon) d \epsilon = G(\epsilon_{max}) - G(0)$$ I am just a bit unsure of how to progress. Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CAF123 said:
The volume of such a tetrahedron is ##V = n_x n_y n_z/6##.

nx, ny, and nz are variables. What are the values of these variables in your expression for V?
 
Hi TSny,
TSny said:
nx, ny, and nz are variables. What are the values of these variables in your expression for V?
I could reexpress anyone of ##n_x, n_y## or ##n_z## using the equation for the energy ##\epsilon = \hbar w(n_x + n_y + n_z + 3/2)## to reduce the number of variables by one. Is it what you meant? The plane in n-space can be written as ##n_x + n_y + n_z = C## for C a constant given by rearranging the above equation. Thanks.
 
The volume of the tetrahedron in n-space should depend only on C. Can you express V in terms of C?
 
TSny said:
The volume of the tetrahedron in n-space should depend only on C. Can you express V in terms of C?
Yes sorry, I was confusing my own notation. The volume is ##C^3/6## and so we have the integral $$\frac{C^3}{6} = \int_0^{\epsilon_{max}} g(\epsilon) d \epsilon = G(\epsilon_{\max}) - G(0) = \frac{1}{6} \left(\frac{\epsilon_{max}}{\hbar w} - \frac{3}{2}\right)^3$$ Then $$\frac{d}{d\epsilon} \left(G(\epsilon) -G(0)\right) = \frac{d}{d\epsilon} \frac{1}{6} \left(\frac{\epsilon}{\hbar w} - \frac{3}{2}\right)^3 \approx \frac{\epsilon^2}{2 (\hbar w)^3}$$ Is this along the right lines? I feel like I have sort of fudged the result in getting ##g(\epsilon)##, in particular how I can neglect further terms in the expansion of the square at the end and in going from ##G(\epsilon_{max}) - G(0)## to ##d/d\epsilon (G(\epsilon) - G(0))##.
 
That looks good.

##\epsilon## is assumed "large". Presumably, that means relative to ##\hbar \omega##. So, you can neglect the 3/2 relative to ##\epsilon/(\hbar \omega)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CAF123

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K